Giovannetti Tania, Sestito Nicole, Libon David J, Schmidt Kara S, Gallo Jennifer L, Gambino Matthew, Chrysikou Evangelia G
Temple University, Psychology Department, Weiss Hall, 1701 N. 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;21(7):607-14. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.005. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
Reports of semantic dementia patients have shown more accurate identification and use for personal objects than unfamiliar analogs of the same objects (e.g., personal comb versus experimenter's comb) [Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (2002). The influence of personal familiarity and context on object use in semantic dementia. Neurocase, 8, 127-134; Snowden, J. S., Griffiths, H., & Neary, D. (1994). Semantic dementia: Autobiographical contribution to preservation of meaning. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 265-288]. Despite potential clinical implications, the personal object advantage has not been explored in various dementia populations. Sixteen mild to moderate dementia patients were tested with 12-15 of their personal objects and laboratory analog objects. Four tasks were administered: Naming, Gesture, Semantic/Script Generation, and Personal Object Decision (i.e., Is this yours?). Although 25% of the sample performed at chance in identifying personal objects as their own, participants generated more specific information (t=2.3, p=.03) and more accurate gestures (t=2.4, p=.03) for personal objects. Thus, the personal object advantage was observed for script/semantic knowledge and movement sequences, and should be considered in residential planning for various dementia patients.
语义性痴呆患者的报告显示,相较于相同物品的陌生仿制品(例如,个人用梳子与实验者用梳子),他们对个人物品的识别和使用更为准确[博泽特,S.,兰伯恩·拉尔夫,M. A.,帕特森,K.,& 霍奇斯,J. R.(2002年)。个人熟悉度和情境对语义性痴呆患者物品使用的影响。《神经病例》,8,127 - 134;斯诺登,J. S.,格里菲思,H.,& 尼里,D.(1994年)。语义性痴呆:自传对意义保存的贡献。《认知神经心理学》,11,265 - 288]。尽管具有潜在的临床意义,但尚未在各类痴呆人群中探究个人物品优势。对16名轻度至中度痴呆患者进行了测试,使用了12 - 15件他们的个人物品和实验室仿制品。实施了四项任务:命名、手势、语义/脚本生成以及个人物品判断(即,这是你的吗?)。尽管25%的样本在将个人物品识别为自己的物品时表现为随机水平,但参与者针对个人物品生成了更具体的信息(t = 2.3,p = .03)以及更准确的手势(t = 2.4,p = .03)。因此,在脚本/语义知识和动作序列方面观察到了个人物品优势,并且在为各类痴呆患者进行居住规划时应予以考虑。