Suppr超能文献

致心律失常性右心室发育不良患者合适的植入式心脏除颤器治疗的预测因素

Predictors of appropriate implantable defibrillator therapies in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia.

作者信息

Piccini Jonathan P, Dalal Darshan, Roguin Ariel, Bomma Chandra, Cheng Alan, Prakasa Kalpana, Dong Jun, Tichnell Crystal, James Cynthia, Russell Stuart, Crosson Jane, Berger Ronald D, Marine Joseph E, Tomaselli Gordon, Calkins Hugh

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Carnegie 592, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2005 Nov;2(11):1188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.08.022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is an inherited cardiomyopathy characterized by ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The risk factors for sudden death and indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement in patients with ARVD are not well defined.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine which clinical and electrophysiologic variables best predict appropriate ICD therapies in patients with ARVD. Particular attention focused on whether the ICD was implanted for primary or second prevention.

METHODS

We enrolled 67 patients (mean age 36 +/- 14 years) with definite or probable ARVD who had undergone ICD placement. Appropriate ICD therapies were recorded, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the event-free survival time between patients based upon the indication for ICD placement (primary vs secondary prevention), results of electrophysiologic testing, and whether the patient had probable or definite ARVD.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up of 4.4 +/- 2.9 years, 40 (73%) of 55 patients who met task force criteria for ARVD and 4 (33%) of 12 patients with probable ARVD had appropriate ICD therapies for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF; P = .027). Mean time to ICD therapy was 1.1 +/- 1.4 years. Eleven of 28 patients who received an ICD for primary prevention (39%) and 33 of 35 patients who received an ICD for secondary prevention (85%) experienced appropriate ICD therapies (P = .001). Electrophysiologic testing did not predict appropriate ICD interventions in patients who received an ICD for primary prevention. Fourteen patients (21%) received ICD therapy for life-threatening (VT/VF >240 bpm) arrhythmias. There was no difference in the incidence of life-threatening arrhythmias in the primary and secondary prevention groups (P = .29).

CONCLUSION

Patients who meet task force criteria for ARVD are at high risk for sudden cardiac death and should undergo ICD placement for primary and secondary prevention, regardless of electrophysiologic testing results. Further research is needed to confirm that a low-risk subset of patients who may not require ICD placement can be identified.

摘要

背景

致心律失常性右室心肌病(ARVD)是一种遗传性心肌病,其特征为室性心律失常和心源性猝死。ARVD患者心源性猝死的危险因素以及植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入的指征尚不明确。

目的

本研究旨在确定哪些临床和电生理变量最能预测ARVD患者ICD的恰当治疗。特别关注ICD植入是用于一级预防还是二级预防。

方法

我们纳入了67例(平均年龄36±14岁)确诊或可能患有ARVD且已植入ICD的患者。记录ICD的恰当治疗情况,并采用Kaplan-Meier分析,根据ICD植入指征(一级预防与二级预防)、电生理检查结果以及患者患有可能的还是确诊的ARVD,比较患者之间的无事件生存时间。

结果

在平均4.4±2.9年的随访期内,符合工作组ARVD标准的55例患者中有40例(73%),可能患有ARVD的12例患者中有4例(33%)因室性心动过速/心室颤动(VT/VF)接受了恰当的ICD治疗(P = 0.027)。ICD治疗的平均时间为1.1±1.4年。接受ICD一级预防的28例患者中有11例(39%),接受ICD二级预防的35例患者中有33例(85%)经历了恰当的ICD治疗(P = 0.001)。电生理检查不能预测接受ICD一级预防患者的ICD恰当干预。14例患者(21%)因危及生命的心律失常(VT/VF>240次/分)接受了ICD治疗。一级预防组和二级预防组中危及生命心律失常的发生率无差异(P = 0.29)。

结论

符合工作组ARVD标准的患者心源性猝死风险高,无论电生理检查结果如何,均应接受ICD植入进行一级和二级预防。需要进一步研究以确认是否可以识别出可能不需要植入ICD的低风险患者亚组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验