Elbogen Eric B, Swanson Jeffrey W, Swartz Marvin S, Van Dorn Richard
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, 27710, USA.
Law Hum Behav. 2005 Oct;29(5):563-74. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-7120-2.
Although representative payeeship is prevalent among people with mental illness and shows promise to positively influence clinically relevant outcomes, research also suggests this legal mechanism could be implemented in ways that are problematic. The current study examined whether family representative payeeship was associated with elevated risk of family violence perpetrated by persons with severe mental illness (SMI). Data were collected every 4 months for 1 year in structured interviews with N = 245 persons with SMI who received disability benefits. Multivariate analyses showed that substance abuse, history of violence, frequency of family contact, and family representative payeeship were associated with elevated odds of family violence. Analyses also showed family contact and family representative payeeship had a cumulative effect on increasing the predicted probability of family violence (controlling for covariates such as violence history and substance abuse). The data shed light on the potential for family representative payeeship to be associated with increased risk of interpersonal conflict and violence in SMI.
尽管法定代理人制度在患有精神疾病的人群中很普遍,并且有望对临床相关结果产生积极影响,但研究也表明,这种法律机制的实施方式可能存在问题。当前的研究调查了家庭法定代理人制度是否与重度精神疾病(SMI)患者实施家庭暴力的风险增加有关。对245名领取残疾福利的SMI患者进行了为期1年的结构化访谈,每4个月收集一次数据。多变量分析表明,药物滥用、暴力史、家庭接触频率和家庭法定代理人制度与家庭暴力几率增加有关。分析还表明,家庭接触和家庭法定代理人制度对增加家庭暴力预测概率具有累积效应(控制暴力史和药物滥用等协变量)。这些数据揭示了家庭法定代理人制度可能与SMI患者人际冲突和暴力风险增加相关的可能性。