Flaherty Alice W
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
J Comp Neurol. 2005 Dec 5;493(1):147-53. doi: 10.1002/cne.20768.
This article presents a three-factor anatomical model of human idea generation and creative drive, focusing on interactions between the temporal lobes, frontal lobes, and limbic system. Evidence is drawn from functional imaging, drug studies, and lesion analysis. Temporal lobe changes, as in hypergraphia, often increase idea generation, sometimes at the expense of quality. Frontal lobe deficits may decrease idea generation, in part because of rigid judgments about an idea's worth. These phenomena are clearest in verbal creativity, and roughly parallel the pressured communication of temporal lobe epilepsy, mania, and Wernicke's aphasia-compared to the sparse speech and cognitive inflexibility of depression, Broca's aphasia, and other frontal lobe lesions. The phenomena also shape non-linguistic creativity, as in that of frontotemporal dementia. The appropriate balance between frontal and temporal activity is mediated by mutually inhibitory corticocortical interactions. Mesolimbic dopamine influences novelty seeking and creative drive. Dopamine agonists and antagonists have opposite effects on goal-directed behavior and hallucinations. Creative drive is not identical to skill-the latter depends more on neocortical association areas. However, drive correlates better with successful creative output than skill does. Traditional neuroscientific models of creativity, such as the left brain - right brain hemispheric model, emphasize skills primarily, and stress art and musical skill at the expense of language and mathematics. The three-factor model proposed here predicts findings in a broad range of normal and pathological states and can be tested in many experimental paradigms.
本文提出了一个关于人类创意生成和创作驱动力的三因素解剖学模型,重点关注颞叶、额叶和边缘系统之间的相互作用。证据来源于功能成像、药物研究和损伤分析。颞叶变化,如书写过多,往往会增加创意生成,有时会以质量为代价。额叶缺陷可能会减少创意生成,部分原因是对创意价值的刻板判断。这些现象在言语创造力方面最为明显,大致与颞叶癫痫、躁狂症和韦尼克失语症的言语逼迫现象相似——与抑郁症、布罗卡失语症和其他额叶损伤的言语稀少和认知僵化形成对比。这些现象也塑造了非语言创造力,如额颞叶痴呆症中的创造力。额叶和颞叶活动之间的适当平衡由相互抑制的皮质-皮质相互作用介导。中脑边缘多巴胺影响新奇寻求和创作驱动力。多巴胺激动剂和拮抗剂对目标导向行为和幻觉有相反的影响。创作驱动力与技能不同——后者更多地依赖于新皮质联合区。然而,驱动力与成功的创造性产出的相关性比技能更强。传统的神经科学创造力模型,如左脑-右脑半球模型,主要强调技能,并以牺牲语言和数学为代价强调艺术和音乐技能。这里提出的三因素模型预测了广泛的正常和病理状态下的结果,并且可以在许多实验范式中进行测试。