Waldo Albert L, Becker Richard C, Tapson Victor F, Colgan Kevin J
Division of Cardiology, Case Western University/University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-5038, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Nov 1;46(9):1729-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.06.077. Epub 2005 Oct 10.
The purpose of this study was to determine both treatment gaps and predictors of warfarin use in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients enrolled in a national multicenter study.
The National Anticoagulation Benchmark Outcomes Report (NABOR) is a performance improvement program designed to benchmark anticoagulation prophylaxis, treatment, and outcomes among participating hospitals.
A retrospective cohort study of inpatients was performed at 21 teaching, 13 community, and 4 Veterans Administration hospitals in the U.S. Patients with an ICD-9-CM code for AF (427.31) were randomly selected.
Among the 945 patients studied, the mean age was 71.5 (+/- 13.5) years; 43% were >75 years of age, 54.5% were men, and 67% had a history of hypertension. Most (86%) had factors that stratified them as at high risk of stroke, and only 55% of those received warfarin. Neither warfarin nor aspirin were prescribed in 21% of high-risk patients, including 18% of those with a previous stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolic event. Age >80 years (p = 0.008) and perceived bleeding risk (p = 0.022) were negative predictors of warfarin use. Persistent/permanent AF (p < 0.001) and history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolus (p = 0.014) were positive predictors of warfarin use, whereas high-risk stratification was not.
This study confirms the under-use of warfarin, but also adds to published reports in several regards. It showed that risk stratification, the guidepost for treatment in international guidelines, had little effect on warfarin use, and that age >80 years and AF classification (permanent/persistent) are factors that influence warfarin use.
本研究旨在确定参加一项全国多中心研究的心房颤动(AF)患者华法林使用的治疗差距及预测因素。
《国家抗凝基准结果报告》(NABOR)是一项旨在对参与医院的抗凝预防、治疗及结果进行基准评估的绩效改进项目。
在美国21家教学医院、13家社区医院和4家退伍军人管理局医院对住院患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。随机选取国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD-9-CM)编码为AF(427.31)的患者。
在研究的945例患者中,平均年龄为71.5(±13.5)岁;43%的患者年龄>75岁,54.5%为男性,67%有高血压病史。大多数(86%)患者有中风高风险因素,其中只有55%接受了华法林治疗。21%的高风险患者未使用华法林或阿司匹林,包括18%有既往中风、短暂性脑缺血发作或全身性栓塞事件的患者。年龄>80岁(p = 0.008)和感知出血风险(p = 0.022)是华法林使用的负性预测因素。持续性/永久性房颤(p < 0.001)和中风、短暂性脑缺血发作或全身性栓塞病史(p = 0.014)是华法林使用的正性预测因素,而高风险分层并非如此。
本研究证实了华法林使用不足,但在几个方面也补充了已发表的报告。研究表明,风险分层作为国际指南中的治疗指导方针,对华法林使用影响不大,年龄>80岁和房颤分类(永久性/持续性)是影响华法林使用的因素。