• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1989年至2003年头部损伤结局的趋势及神经外科护理的影响:一项观察性研究。

Trends in head injury outcome from 1989 to 2003 and the effect of neurosurgical care: an observational study.

作者信息

Patel H C, Bouamra O, Woodford M, King A T, Yates D W, Lecky F E

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Hope Hospital, Salford, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2005;366(9496):1538-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67626-X.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67626-X
PMID:16257340
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Case fatality rates after all types of blunt injury have not improved since 1994 in England and Wales, possibly because not all patients with severe head injury are treated in a neurosurgical centre. Our aims were to investigate the case fatality trends in major trauma patients with and without head injury, and to establish the effect of neurosurgical care on mortality after severe head injury.

METHODS

We analysed prospectively collected data from the Trauma Audit and Research Network database for patients presenting between 1989 and 2003. Mortality and odds of death adjusted for case mix were compared for patients with and without head injury, and for those treated in a neurosurgical versus a non-neurosurgical centre.

FINDINGS

Patients with head injury (n=22,216) had a ten-fold higher mortality and showed less improvement in the adjusted odds of death since 1989 than did patients without head injury (n=154,231). 2305 (33%) of patients with severe head injury (presenting between 1996 and 2003) were treated only in non-neurosurgical centres; such treatment was associated with a 26% increase in mortality and a 2.15-fold increase (95% CI 1.77-2.60) in the odds of death adjusted for case mix compared with patients treated at a neurosurgical centre.

INTERPRETATION

Since 1989 trauma system changes in England and Wales have delivered greater benefit to patients without head injury. Our data lend support to current guidelines, suggesting that treatment in a neurosurgical centre represents an important strategy in the management of severe head injury.

摘要

背景

自1994年以来,英格兰和威尔士各类钝性损伤后的病死率并未改善,这可能是因为并非所有重度颅脑损伤患者都在神经外科中心接受治疗。我们的目的是调查有无颅脑损伤的主要创伤患者的病死率趋势,并确定神经外科护理对重度颅脑损伤后死亡率的影响。

方法

我们前瞻性分析了创伤审计与研究网络数据库中1989年至2003年期间就诊患者的数据。比较了有无颅脑损伤患者以及在神经外科中心与非神经外科中心接受治疗患者的死亡率和经病例组合调整后的死亡几率。

结果

自1989年以来,有颅脑损伤的患者(n = 22,216)死亡率高出10倍,且经调整后的死亡几率改善程度低于无颅脑损伤的患者(n = 154,231)。2305例(33%)重度颅脑损伤患者(1996年至2003年期间就诊)仅在非神经外科中心接受治疗;与在神经外科中心接受治疗的患者相比,这种治疗与死亡率增加26%以及经病例组合调整后的死亡几率增加2.15倍(95%可信区间1.77 - 2.60)相关。

解读

自1989年以来,英格兰和威尔士的创伤系统变化为无颅脑损伤的患者带来了更大益处。我们的数据支持当前指南,表明在神经外科中心进行治疗是重度颅脑损伤管理中的一项重要策略。

相似文献

1
Trends in head injury outcome from 1989 to 2003 and the effect of neurosurgical care: an observational study.1989年至2003年头部损伤结局的趋势及神经外科护理的影响:一项观察性研究。
Lancet. 2005;366(9496):1538-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67626-X.
2
Temporal trends in head injury outcomes from 2003 to 2009 in England and Wales.2003年至2009年英格兰和威尔士头部损伤结果的时间趋势。
Br J Neurosurg. 2011 Jun;25(3):414-21. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2011.570882. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
3
Comparison of mortality following hospitalisation for isolated head injury in England and Wales, and Victoria, Australia.英格兰和威尔士与澳大利亚维多利亚州因孤立性头部损伤住院后死亡率的比较。
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020545. Epub 2011 May 31.
4
The effect of specialist neurosciences care on outcome in adult severe head injury: a cohort study.专科神经科学护理对成人严重颅脑损伤结局的影响:一项队列研究。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011 Jul;23(3):198-205. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3182161816.
5
Head Injury in the Elderly: What Are the Outcomes of Neurosurgical Care?老年人头部损伤:神经外科治疗的结果如何?
World Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;94:493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.057. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
6
Coagulopathy in severe closed head injury: is empiric therapy warranted?重度闭合性颅脑损伤中的凝血功能障碍:是否需要经验性治疗?
Am Surg. 1997 Mar;63(3):233-6; discussion 236-7.
7
Association between alcohol and mortality in patients with severe traumatic head injury.重度创伤性脑损伤患者饮酒与死亡率之间的关联。
Arch Surg. 2006 Dec;141(12):1185-91; discussion 1192. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.12.1185.
8
Prediction value of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria for positive head CT scan and acute neurosurgical procedures in minor head trauma: a multicenter external validation study.加拿大头颅CT规则和新奥尔良标准对轻度头部创伤中头颅CT扫描阳性及急性神经外科手术的预测价值:一项多中心外部验证研究
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 May;61(5):521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.07.016. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
9
Early neurosurgical procedures enhance survival in blunt head injury: propensity score analysis.早期神经外科手术可提高钝性颅脑损伤患者的生存率:倾向评分分析
J Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;37(2):115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
10
Functional and survival outcomes in traumatic blunt thoracic aortic injuries: An analysis of the National Trauma Databank.创伤性钝性胸主动脉损伤的功能和生存结果:一项对国家创伤数据库的分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Apr;49(4):988-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.052.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of traumatic brain injury patients in an adult intensive care unit of a South African regional hospital, without on-site neurosurgical service: A retrospective quantitative study on the neurological improvement at discharge.南非一家地区医院成人重症监护病房中无现场神经外科服务的创伤性脑损伤患者的治疗结果:一项关于出院时神经功能改善情况的回顾性定量研究
South Afr J Crit Care. 2023 Dec 13;39(3):e1286. doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2023.v39i3.1286. eCollection 2023.
2
Use of magnetic source imaging to assess recovery after severe traumatic brain injury-an MEG pilot study.使用磁源成像评估重度创伤性脑损伤后的恢复情况——一项脑磁图初步研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 3;14:1257886. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1257886. eCollection 2023.
3
Towards exploring current challenges and future opportunities relating to the prehospital triage of patients with traumatic brain injury: a mixed-methods study protocol.
旨在探索与创伤性脑损伤患者院前分诊相关的当前挑战和未来机遇:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 7;13(3):e068555. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068555.
4
Camel-Related Head Injury in a High-Income Developing Country.一个高收入发展中国家与骆驼相关的头部损伤
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2022 Oct-Dec;15(4):162-166. doi: 10.4103/jets.jets_88_22. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
5
Use of Hyperoncotic Human Albumin Solution in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Revisited-A Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis.重度创伤性脑损伤中高渗人白蛋白溶液的应用再探讨——一项叙述性综述和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 May 9;11(9):2662. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092662.
6
The prevalence and risk factors of posttraumatic cerebral infarction in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颅脑创伤患者创伤后脑梗死的患病率及相关危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bioengineered. 2022 May;13(5):11706-11717. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2070999.
7
Brainstem and Cortical Spreading Depolarization in a Closed Head Injury Rat Model.脑干和皮质扩散性去极化在闭合性颅脑损伤大鼠模型中的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct 28;22(21):11642. doi: 10.3390/ijms222111642.
8
Trends in mortality after intensive care of patients with traumatic brain injury in Finland from 2003 to 2019: a Finnish Intensive Care Consortium study.2003 年至 2019 年芬兰创伤性脑损伤患者重症监护后死亡率趋势:芬兰重症监护协会研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Jan;164(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-05034-4. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
9
Primary versus early secondary referral to a specialized neurotrauma center in patients with moderate/severe traumatic brain injury: a CENTER TBI study.初次就诊与早期二次转诊至专门的神经创伤中心治疗中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的效果比较:一项 CENTER TBI 研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 4;29(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00930-1.
10
Traumatic Brain Injury: A Perspective on the Silent Epidemic.创伤性脑损伤:对这一隐匿性流行病的透视
Cureus. 2021 May 29;13(5):e15318. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15318.