• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰和威尔士与澳大利亚维多利亚州因孤立性头部损伤住院后死亡率的比较。

Comparison of mortality following hospitalisation for isolated head injury in England and Wales, and Victoria, Australia.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020545. Epub 2011 May 31.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0020545
PMID:21655237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3105093/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend transfer of severe TBI cases to neurosurgical centres, irrespective of the need for neurosurgery. This observational study investigated the risk-adjusted mortality of isolated TBI admissions in England/Wales, and Victoria, Australia, and the impact of neurosurgical centre management on outcomes.

METHODS

Isolated TBI admissions (>15 years, July 2005-June 2006) were extracted from the hospital discharge datasets for both jurisdictions. Severe isolated TBI (AIS severity >3) admissions were provided by the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) and Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR) for England/Wales, and Victoria, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare risk-adjusted mortality between jurisdictions.

FINDINGS

Mortality was 12% (749/6256) in England/Wales and 9% (91/1048) in Victoria for isolated TBI admissions. Adjusted odds of death in England/Wales were higher compared to Victoria overall (OR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.6, 2.5), and for cases <65 years (OR 2.36, 95% CI: 1.51, 3.69). For severe TBI, mortality was 23% (133/575) for TARN and 20% (68/346) for VSTR, with 72% of TARN and 86% of VSTR cases managed at a neurosurgical centre. The adjusted mortality odds for severe TBI cases in TARN were higher compared to the VSTR (OR 1.45, 95% CI: 0.96, 2.19), but particularly for cases <65 years (OR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.07, 3.90). Neurosurgical centre management modified the effect overall (OR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.73, 1.74) and for cases <65 years (OR 1.53, 95% CI: 0.77, 3.03).

CONCLUSION

The risk-adjusted odds of mortality for all isolated TBI admissions, and severe TBI cases, were higher in England/Wales when compared to Victoria. The lower percentage of cases managed at neurosurgical centres in England and Wales was an explanatory factor, supporting the changes made to the NICE guidelines.

摘要

背景

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)仍然是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因。英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南建议将严重 TBI 病例转至神经外科中心,无论是否需要神经外科治疗。本观察性研究调查了英格兰/威尔士和澳大利亚维多利亚州 TBI 单纯性病例入院的风险调整死亡率,并研究了神经外科中心管理对结局的影响。

方法

从两个司法管辖区的医院出院数据集中提取 TBI 单纯性病例(>15 岁,2005 年 7 月至 2006 年 6 月)。严重 TBI 单纯性病例(AIS 严重程度>3)由创伤审核和研究网络(TARN)和维多利亚州创伤登记处(VSTR)分别提供给英格兰/威尔士和维多利亚州。采用多变量逻辑回归比较两个司法管辖区的风险调整死亡率。

结果

英格兰/威尔士 TBI 单纯性病例入院的死亡率为 12%(749/6256),维多利亚州为 9%(91/1048)。总体而言,英格兰/威尔士的死亡调整优势比高于维多利亚州(OR 2.0,95%CI:1.6,2.5),65 岁以下病例的优势比更高(OR 2.36,95%CI:1.51,3.69)。对于严重 TBI,TARN 中的死亡率为 23%(133/575),VSTR 为 20%(68/346),72%的 TARN 和 86%的 VSTR 病例在神经外科中心接受治疗。TARN 中严重 TBI 病例的调整死亡率优势比高于 VSTR(OR 1.45,95%CI:0.96,2.19),但 65 岁以下病例的优势比更高(OR 2.04,95%CI:1.07,3.90)。神经外科中心管理改变了总体死亡率优势比(OR 1.12,95%CI:0.73,1.74)和 65 岁以下病例的死亡率优势比(OR 1.53,95%CI:0.77,3.03)。

结论

与维多利亚州相比,英格兰/威尔士所有 TBI 单纯性病例和严重 TBI 病例的风险调整死亡率更高。英格兰和威尔士接受神经外科中心治疗的病例比例较低是一个解释因素,支持对 NICE 指南进行的更改。

相似文献

1
Comparison of mortality following hospitalisation for isolated head injury in England and Wales, and Victoria, Australia.英格兰和威尔士与澳大利亚维多利亚州因孤立性头部损伤住院后死亡率的比较。
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020545. Epub 2011 May 31.
2
The effect of an organized trauma system on mortality in major trauma involving serious head injury: a comparison of the United kingdom and victoria, australia.组织化创伤体系对涉及严重头部损伤的重大创伤患者死亡率的影响:英国和澳大利亚维多利亚州的比较。
Ann Surg. 2011 Jan;253(1):138-43. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f6685b.
3
Traumatic brain injury in England and Wales: prospective audit of epidemiology, complications and standardised mortality.英格兰和威尔士的创伤性脑损伤:流行病学、并发症及标准化死亡率的前瞻性审计
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 24;6(11):e012197. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012197.
4
Comparison of the serious injury pattern of adult bicyclists, between South-West Netherlands and the State of Victoria, Australia 2001-2009.2001-2009 年,荷兰西南部与澳大利亚维多利亚州成人自行车骑手重伤模式比较。
Injury. 2013 Jun;44(6):848-54. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
5
Trends in head injury outcome from 1989 to 2003 and the effect of neurosurgical care: an observational study.1989年至2003年头部损伤结局的趋势及神经外科护理的影响:一项观察性研究。
Lancet. 2005;366(9496):1538-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67626-X.
6
Intracranial bleeding in patients with traumatic brain injury: a prognostic study.创伤性脑损伤患者的颅内出血:一项预后研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2009 Aug 3;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-9-15.
7
Evaluation of the impact of the NICE head injury guidelines on inpatient mortality from traumatic brain injury: an interrupted time series analysis.评价 NICE 颅脑损伤指南对创伤性脑损伤患者住院死亡率的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 4;9(6):e028912. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028912.
8
Improving mortality after extradural haematoma in England and Wales.提高英格兰和威尔士硬膜外血肿后的死亡率。
Br J Neurosurg. 2013 Feb;27(1):19-23. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2012.709555. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
9
Temporal trends in head injury outcomes from 2003 to 2009 in England and Wales.2003年至2009年英格兰和威尔士头部损伤结果的时间趋势。
Br J Neurosurg. 2011 Jun;25(3):414-21. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2011.570882. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
10
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of trauma care structures, processes and outcomes between the English National Health Service and Quebec, Canada.英国国家医疗服务体系与加拿大魁北克省创伤救治结构、流程和结局比较。
Can J Surg. 2023 Jan 18;66(1):E32-E41. doi: 10.1503/cjs.001822. Print 2023 Jan-Feb.
2
Impact of a physician - critical care practitioner pre-hospital service in Wales on trauma survival: a retrospective analysis of linked registry data.威尔士医师-危重病护理医师院前服务对创伤生存的影响:基于关联登记数据的回顾性分析。
Anaesthesia. 2021 Nov;76(11):1475-1481. doi: 10.1111/anae.15457. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
The role of the complement system in traumatic brain injury: a review.补体系统在创伤性脑损伤中的作用:综述。
J Neuroinflammation. 2018 Jan 22;15(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1066-z.
4
The Decrease in Traumatic Brain Injury Epidemics Deriving from Road Traffic Collision Following Strengthened Legislative Measures in France.法国强化立法措施后道路交通碰撞所致创伤性脑损伤流行率的下降
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11):e0167082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167082. eCollection 2016.
5
A case study of the Secure Anonymous Information Linkage (SAIL) Gateway: a privacy-protecting remote access system for health-related research and evaluation.安全匿名信息链接(SAIL)网关的案例研究:一种用于健康相关研究与评估的隐私保护远程访问系统。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Aug;50(100):196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of an organized trauma system on mortality in major trauma involving serious head injury: a comparison of the United kingdom and victoria, australia.组织化创伤体系对涉及严重头部损伤的重大创伤患者死亡率的影响:英国和澳大利亚维多利亚州的比较。
Ann Surg. 2011 Jan;253(1):138-43. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f6685b.
2
Missing in action: a case study of the application of methods for dealing with missing data to trauma system benchmarking.失踪人员:应用处理缺失数据的方法进行创伤系统基准测试的案例研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;17(10):1122-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00887.x.
3
Population-based capture of long-term functional and quality of life outcomes after major trauma: the experiences of the Victorian State Trauma Registry.基于人群的重大创伤后长期功能和生活质量结局的记录:维多利亚州创伤登记处的经验
J Trauma. 2010 Sep;69(3):532-6; discussion 536. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e5125b.
4
A statewide system of trauma care in Victoria: effect on patient survival.维多利亚州的全州创伤护理系统:对患者生存率的影响。
Med J Aust. 2008 Nov 17;189(10):546-50. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02176.x.
5
Management of patients with head injury.
Lancet. 2008 Aug 23;372(9639):685-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61280-5.
6
High risk trauma in older adults in Hong Kong: a multicentre study.香港老年人的高风险创伤:一项多中心研究。
Injury. 2008 Sep;39(9):1034-41. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.03.017. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
7
Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients.预测创伤性脑损伤后的结局:基于大量国际患者队列的实用预后模型。
BMJ. 2008 Feb 23;336(7641):425-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39461.643438.25. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
8
Usefulness of the abbreviated injury score and the injury severity score in comparison to the Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury.与格拉斯哥昏迷量表相比,简明损伤评分和损伤严重程度评分在预测创伤性脑损伤后结局方面的效用。
J Trauma. 2007 Apr;62(4):946-50. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000229796.14717.3a.
9
Do we need neurosurgical coverage in the trauma center?我们的创伤中心需要神经外科覆盖吗?
Adv Surg. 2006;40:213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2006.06.002.
10
The importance of quality of survival as an outcome measure for an integrated trauma system.生存质量作为综合创伤系统的一项结局指标的重要性。
Injury. 2006 Dec;37(12):1178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Nov 7.