Cosgrave John, Foley J Brendan, Bahadur Khan, Bennett Kathleen, Crean Peter, Walsh Michael J
Department of Cardiology, EMO Centro Cuore Columbus, Via M. Buonarotti 48, 20145, Milano, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2006 Jun 28;110(3):373-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.08.028. Epub 2005 Oct 28.
Electrical cardioversion is a common modality of therapy for persistent atrial fibrillation. Unfortunately even if the cardioversion is initially successful many patients revert to atrial fibrillation. It has been proposed that there may be an inflammatory component to this arrhythmia. It is interesting to speculate that this may have a role in determining the outcome following elective cardioversion.
The study group consisted of 81 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing elective external cardioversion. Blood samples were taken immediately prior to the procedure. Soluble E-Selectin, P-Selectin, intra-cellular adhesion molecule and vascular cell adhesion molecule were assayed using a commercially available enzyme linked immunosorbent assay technique (R&D systems) and high sensitivity C reactive protein was measured by rate nephelometry. Patients were reviewed at 8 weeks and bloods were taken at this time.
At baseline patients who had an unsuccessful cardioversion (n=15) were compared to those who had a successful cardioversion (n=66). Thirty-two patients of the 66 initially successful patients reverted to atrial fibrillation during the follow-up period. There was no difference in the levels of baseline serum inflammatory markers measured between those with an unsuccessful cardioversion and those who were successful. When the group who reverted to atrial fibrillation were compared to those who remained in sinus rhythm again there was no difference in the levels of serum markers measured at baseline.
There was no association between maintenance of sinus rhythm following cardioversion and serum inflammatory markers.
电复律是持续性房颤常见的治疗方式。遗憾的是,即使复律最初成功,许多患者仍会复发房颤。有人提出这种心律失常可能存在炎症成分。推测这可能在决定择期复律后的结果中起作用,这很有意思。
研究组由81例接受择期体外复律的持续性房颤患者组成。在手术前即刻采集血样。使用市售酶联免疫吸附测定技术(R&D系统)检测可溶性E选择素、P选择素、细胞间黏附分子和血管细胞黏附分子,并通过速率散射比浊法测定高敏C反应蛋白。在8周时对患者进行复查并采集血样。
在基线时,将复律不成功的患者(n = 15)与复律成功的患者(n = 66)进行比较。66例最初成功的患者中有32例在随访期间复发房颤。复律不成功的患者与成功的患者之间,基线血清炎症标志物水平没有差异。当将复发房颤的组与再次维持窦性心律的组进行比较时,基线时测定的血清标志物水平也没有差异。
复律后窦性心律的维持与血清炎症标志物之间没有关联。