Crossley Jon P, Salter Denis P
School of Psychology, Clinical Section, University of Leicester, UK.
Psychol Psychother. 2005 Sep;78(Pt 3):295-313. doi: 10.1348/147608305X26783.
In spite of the increasing emphasis upon spirituality in the psychological literature, research continues to highlight concerns that issues relating to spirituality are regularly overlooked within a therapeutic setting. The aim of the current study was to develop an account of the way in which clinical psychologists understand and address spirituality within therapy. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight clinical psychologists. The transcripts were analysed using the qualitative methodology of grounded theory, which also informed the data collection process. Two core categories were developed and termed spirituality as an elusive concept and finding harmony with spiritual beliefs. The diversity of meaning surrounding spirituality and the relative lack of engagement was found to create difficulty for constructing spirituality coherently as a concept. When specifically considering methods for identifying and addressing spiritual beliefs, contrasting approaches were identified. This diversity in understanding and approach has implications for the process and outcome of therapy, which are discussed in detail. Recommendations are suggested for developing spirituality as a more coherent and accessible concept, both within professional dialogue and the therapeutic context.
尽管心理学文献中对灵性的重视日益增加,但研究仍不断强调,在治疗环境中,与灵性相关的问题经常被忽视。本研究的目的是阐述临床心理学家在治疗中理解和处理灵性的方式。对八位临床心理学家进行了半结构化访谈。使用扎根理论的定性方法对访谈记录进行了分析,该方法也为数据收集过程提供了指导。形成了两个核心类别,分别称为难以捉摸的灵性概念以及与精神信仰达成和谐。围绕灵性的意义多样性以及相对缺乏参与度,给将灵性连贯地构建为一个概念带来了困难。在具体考虑识别和处理精神信仰的方法时,发现了截然不同的方法。这种理解和方法上的多样性对治疗过程和结果具有影响,将对此进行详细讨论。针对在专业对话和治疗背景下将灵性发展为一个更连贯且易于理解的概念,提出了建议。