Osborn G D, Pike H, Smith M, Winter R, Vaughan-Williams E
Department of General Surgery, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005 Nov;87(6):458-60. doi: 10.1308/003588405X60632.
High quality entries in case notes are becoming increasingly important. Standards exist on what information entries should contain. We have compared case notes from surgical teams at the Royal Glamorgan Hospital with standards based on guidelines from The Royal College of Surgeons of England.
A total of 120 case notes, randomly selected from the department of general surgery, were reviewed.
An 80% compliance was achieved in 25/35 standards and 100% was achieved in 6 (patient's name, date, surgeon's name and type of operation on the operation sheet and consent form signed and dated). The following fell short of 80% compliance: PAS number on every page (75%); entries timed (27%); and clinician's name (16%) and designation (27%) printed. Social history was only recorded in 73% of clerkings and family history in 33%. Results of laboratory tests were signed in 65% of notes and radiological tests were signed in 41%.
Healthcare professionals need to be aware of, and comply with, standards. House officers should be given information about standards at departmental induction or during medical training.
病例记录中的高质量条目变得越来越重要。关于条目应包含哪些信息有相应标准。我们将皇家格拉摩根医院外科团队的病例记录与基于英国皇家外科医学院指南的标准进行了比较。
从普通外科随机抽取了120份病例记录进行审查。
在35项标准中,25项达到了80%的合规率,6项(患者姓名、日期、外科医生姓名、手术单上的手术类型以及签署并注明日期的同意书)达到了100%的合规率。以下方面未达到80%的合规率:每页的PAS编号(75%);记录时间(27%);打印临床医生姓名(16%)和职称(27%)。社会史仅在73% 的病历记录中有所记载,家族史在33% 的病历记录中有所记载。65% 的检查报告有签名,41% 的放射检查报告有签名。
医疗保健专业人员需要了解并遵守标准。应在科室入职培训或医学培训期间向住院医生提供有关标准的信息。