Suppr超能文献

芮氏线数量与其在叠瓦状釉质形成中的周期性之间的关系。

The relationship between number of striae of Retzius and their periodicity in imbricational enamel formation.

作者信息

Reid Donald J, Ferrell Rebecca J

机构信息

School of Dental Sciences, Framlington Place, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4BW, UK.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2006 Feb;50(2):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.09.002. Epub 2005 Nov 2.

Abstract

Imbricational crown formation times (ICFTs) estimated from the number of perikymata on tooth surfaces are error-prone because the number of days between adjacent perikymata varies across individuals and species, and is only visible within tooth microstructure. We investigated striae of Retzius (SR) numbers (analogous to perikymata numbers), SR periodicities (days between SR or perikymata), and ICFTs for a mandibular canine sample (n=49) from medieval Denmark. We tested the relationship between SR number and periodicity to determine whether regression formulae could be produced that would allow periodicity (and ICFTs) to be determined from surface perikymata numbers. Periodicities (range=7-11 days, mode=8) and SR numbers (range=142-257, mean=190.3, s.d.=27.5) were normally distributed; ICFTs were non-normal (mean=1,594 days, s.d.=65.7). We tested periodicity as a quadratic, linear, and log-log transform linear function of SR number and found an inverse relationship (quadratic: R2=0.9504; linear: R2=0.9138; log-log transform: R2=0.9418; all p<0.001) that allowed estimation of periodicity from SR or perikymata numbers in this population and tooth type. If periodicity and SR number are inversely related in other hominin taxa, studies that have estimated ICFT by multiplying perikymata number by a human modal periodicity value or made inferences about development based only on perikymata numbers may have introduced substantial error into their ICFT estimates and life history inferences. The inverse relationship is similar to that predicted by a model of SR formation in which the ICFT for a given tooth type and population is held constant and all combinations of periodicity and SR number result in the same ICFT. However, we found that lower periodicities had longer ICFTs and higher periodicities had shorter ICFTs than the model predicted, suggesting that the model may not reflect the real process, or that there are other factors (e.g., sample size, misclassification, sexual dimorphism) also affecting the relationship between periodicity and SR number.

摘要

根据牙齿表面釉质横纹数量估算的叠瓦状牙冠形成时间(ICFTs)容易出现误差,因为相邻釉质横纹之间的天数在个体和物种间存在差异,并且仅在牙齿微观结构中可见。我们研究了来自中世纪丹麦的下颌犬齿样本(n = 49)的芮氏线(SR)数量(类似于釉质横纹数量)、SR周期(相邻SR或釉质横纹之间的天数)以及ICFTs。我们测试了SR数量与周期之间的关系,以确定是否可以得出回归公式,从而能够根据表面釉质横纹数量确定周期(以及ICFTs)。周期(范围 = 7 - 11天,众数 = 8)和SR数量(范围 = 142 - 257,均值 = 190.3,标准差 = 27.5)呈正态分布;ICFTs呈非正态分布(均值 = 1594天,标准差 = 65.7)。我们将周期测试为SR数量的二次、线性和对数 - 对数变换线性函数,发现存在反比关系(二次:R² = 0.9504;线性:R² = 0.9138;对数 - 对数变换:R² = 0.9418;所有p < 0.001),这使得在该种群和牙齿类型中能够根据SR或釉质横纹数量估算周期。如果在其他古人类类群中周期与SR数量呈反比关系,那么那些通过将釉质横纹数量乘以人类模式周期值来估算ICFT,或者仅基于釉质横纹数量进行发育推断的研究,可能在其ICFT估算和生活史推断中引入了大量误差。这种反比关系类似于由SR形成模型预测的关系,在该模型中,给定牙齿类型和种群的ICFT保持恒定,并且周期和SR数量的所有组合都导致相同的ICFT。然而,我们发现,与模型预测相比,较低的周期具有较长的ICFTs,较高的周期具有较短的ICFTs,这表明该模型可能无法反映真实过程,或者存在其他因素(例如样本大小、错误分类、性别二态性)也在影响周期与SR数量之间的关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验