Suppr超能文献

医疗补助计划对新生儿的接纳情况以及为参加医疗补助计划的新生儿提供及时随访服务的可及性。

Medicaid acceptance and availability of timely follow-up for newborns with Medicaid.

作者信息

Galbraith Alison A, Grossman David C, Koepsell Thomas D, Heagerty Patrick J, Christakis Dimitri A

机构信息

Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):1148-54. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2584.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Decreased physician participation in Medicaid has been shown to affect adversely timeliness of adult acute care and pediatric specialty care, but it is not clear whether this is the case for newborn follow-up. The objectives of this study were to determine whether there is a difference within clinics in the timeliness of follow-up appointments that are given to newborns with Medicaid compared with newborns with private insurance and to determine whether there is a difference between clinics that do and do not accept Medicaid in the timeliness of appointments that are given for newborn follow-up.

METHODS

A randomized crossover study was conducted among general pediatric clinics and practices that were identified from the yellow pages and Internet searches of hospitals and health departments in 8 metropolitan areas from September 2003 to March 2004. A simulated parent telephoned clinics to find the earliest available appointment for a 1-day-old infant who needed routine follow-up after discharge that day. Clinics were randomly assigned to receive a first call from a patient with either Medicaid or private insurance; each clinic received the same call at least 3 weeks later with the patient's insurance status reversed. The main outcome measure was whether the appointment was timely (< or =2 days from the day of the call).

RESULTS

Of 401 participating clinics, 22% did not accept Medicaid. Among clinics that accepted Medicaid, availability of a timely appointment for a newborn with Medicaid was similar to that for a newborn with private insurance (87% vs 90%, respectively). Appointments that were provided to privately insured newborns were as likely to be timely in clinics that accept Medicaid as in clinics that do not accept Medicaid (89.5% vs 93.4%, respectively). However, providing timely appointments was significantly less likely in clinics that were in high-poverty locations compared with clinics that were not (86.1% vs 92.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although newborns with Medicaid did not have access to >20% of clinics because of their insurance, among clinics that did accept Medicaid, timeliness of available follow-up was similar for newborns with Medicaid compared with newborns with private insurance and similar between clinics that did and did not accept Medicaid. However, to the extent that care for newborns with Medicaid is concentrated in clinics in high-poverty areas, some newborns with Medicaid may not be able to receive timely appointments.

摘要

目的

已有研究表明,医生参与医疗补助计划的积极性降低会对成人急性护理和儿科专科护理的及时性产生不利影响,但新生儿随访是否如此尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定,与有私人保险的新生儿相比,医疗补助计划覆盖的新生儿在诊所接受随访预约的及时性在各诊所之间是否存在差异,以及接受和不接受医疗补助计划的诊所,在新生儿随访预约的及时性方面是否存在差异。

方法

2003年9月至2004年3月,在8个大都市地区,通过医院和卫生部门的黄页及互联网搜索,确定了一些普通儿科诊所和医疗机构,进行了一项随机交叉研究。一名模拟家长致电各诊所,为一名1日龄婴儿寻找出院后最早的常规随访预约。诊所被随机分配,先接到来自有医疗补助计划或私人保险患者的首次致电;至少3周后,每个诊所会接到同一患者的再次致电,但其保险状态相反。主要观察指标是预约是否及时(致电当天起≤2天)。

结果

401家参与研究的诊所中,22%不接受医疗补助计划。在接受医疗补助计划的诊所中,医疗补助计划覆盖的新生儿获得及时预约的可能性与有私人保险的新生儿相似(分别为87%和90%)。在接受医疗补助计划的诊所中,为有私人保险的新生儿提供的预约与在不接受医疗补助计划的诊所中一样有可能及时(分别为89.5%和93.4%)。然而,与非高贫困地区的诊所相比,高贫困地区诊所提供及时预约的可能性显著更低(分别为86.1%和92.7%)。

结论

尽管医疗补助计划覆盖的新生儿因保险问题无法进入20%以上的诊所,但在接受医疗补助计划的诊所中,医疗补助计划覆盖的新生儿与有私人保险的新生儿获得随访的及时性相似,且接受和不接受医疗补助计划的诊所之间也相似。然而,由于医疗补助计划覆盖的新生儿护理集中在高贫困地区的诊所,一些医疗补助计划覆盖的新生儿可能无法获得及时预约。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验