Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Str, 176 - 178, D-50935 Cologne, Germany.
Int J Equity Health. 2008 Jan 9;7:1. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-7-1.
Health insurance coverage for all citizens is often considered a requisite for reducing disparities in health care accessibility. In Germany, health insurees are covered either by statutory health insurance (SHI) or private health insurance (PHI). Due to a 20%-35% higher reimbursement of physicians for patients with PHI, it is often claimed that patients with SHI are faced with longer waiting times when it comes to obtaining outpatient appointments. There is little empirical evidence regarding outpatient waiting times for patients with different health insurance status in Germany.
We called 189 specialist practices in the region of Cologne, Leverkusen, and Bonn. Practices were selected from publicly available telephone directories (Yellow Pages 2006/2007) for the specified region. Data were collected for all practices within each of five specialist fields. We requested an appointment for one of five different elective treatments (allergy test plus pulmonary function test, pupil dilation, gastroscopy, hearing test, MRT of the knee) by calling selected practices. The caller was randomly assigned the status of private or statutory health insuree. The total period of data collection amounted to 4.5 weeks in April and May 2006.
Between 41.7% and 100% of the practices called were included according to specialist field. We excluded practices that did not offer the requested treatment, were closed for more than one week, did not answer the call, did not offer fixed appointments ("open consultation hour") or did not accept any newly registered patients. Waiting time difference between private and statutory policyholders was 17.6 working days (SHI 26.0; PHI 8.4) for allergy test plus pulmonary function test; 17.0 (25.2; 8.2) for pupil dilation; 24.8 (36.7; 11.9) for gastroscopy; 4.6 (6.8; 2.2) for hearing test and 9.5 (14.1; 4.6) for the MRT of the knee. In relative terms, the difference in working days amounted to 3.08 (95%-KI: 1,88 bis 5,04) and proved significant.
Even with comprehensive health insurance coverage for almost 100% of the population, Germany shows clear differences in access to care, with SHI patients waiting 3.08 times longer for an appointment than PHI patients. Wide-spread anecdotal reports of shorter waiting times for PHI patients were empirically supported. Discrepancies in access to care not only depend on accessibility to comprehensive health insurance cover, but also on the level of reimbursement for the physician. Higher reimbursements for the provider when it comes to comparable health problems and diagnostic treatments could lead to improved access to care. We conclude that incentives for adjusting access to care according to the necessity of treatment should be implemented.
全民医疗保险通常被认为是减少医疗服务可及性差距的必要条件。在德国,被保险人可以通过法定健康保险(SHI)或私人健康保险(PHI)获得保险。由于 PHI 患者的医生报销比例高出 20%-35%,因此人们经常声称 SHI 患者在获得门诊预约时需要等待更长的时间。关于德国不同健康保险状况的患者门诊等候时间,几乎没有经验证据。
我们拨打了科隆、勒沃库森和波恩地区的 189 家专科诊所。这些诊所是从指定地区的公开电话簿(2006/2007 年黄页)中选择的。在五个专科领域的每个领域内,我们都为每个诊所收集了数据。我们通过拨打选定的诊所,为五种不同的选择性治疗(过敏测试加肺功能测试、瞳孔扩张、胃镜检查、听力测试、膝关节磁共振成像)中的一种预约。来电者被随机分配为私人或法定健康保险被保险人的身份。数据收集工作于 2006 年 4 月和 5 月的 4.5 周内完成。
根据专科领域的不同,41.7%至 100%的被调查诊所均被纳入研究。我们排除了未提供所要求治疗、已关闭超过一周、未接听电话、未提供固定预约(“开放咨询时间”)或不接受任何新登记患者的诊所。过敏测试加肺功能测试的私人和法定保险参保人之间的等候时间差异为 17.6 个工作日(SHI:26.0;PHI:8.4);瞳孔扩张为 17.0(25.2;8.2);胃镜检查为 24.8(36.7;11.9);听力测试为 4.6(6.8;2.2);膝关节磁共振成像为 9.5(14.1;4.6)。相对而言,工作日的差异为 3.08(95%可信区间:1.88 至 5.04),且具有统计学意义。
即使德国近 100%的人口享有全面的医疗保险,但在获得医疗服务方面仍存在明显差异,SHI 患者的预约等待时间比 PHI 患者长 3.08 倍。对 PHI 患者等候时间更短的广泛传闻得到了经验证据的支持。获得医疗服务的差异不仅取决于全面医疗保险覆盖范围的可及性,还取决于医生报销水平。在可比的健康问题和诊断治疗方面,为提供者提供更高的报销可能会改善获得医疗服务的机会。我们得出结论,应实施调整医疗服务机会以满足治疗必要性的激励措施。