• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与受试者沟通:复苏研究面临的特殊挑战。

Communicating with subjects: special challenges for resuscitation research.

作者信息

Wilets Ilene, Schears Raquel Marie, Gligorov Nada

机构信息

Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1060-3. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.019.

DOI:10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.019
PMID:16264075
Abstract

In May 2005, Academic Emergency Medicine sponsored a one-day consensus conference held in association with the 2005 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine meeting in New York City. The conference, entitled "Ethical Conduct of Resuscitation Research," addressed a variety of issues regarding the successful conduct of research in acute care settings. A number of important breakout sessions were convened based on challenges specific to resuscitation research. "Communicating with Subjects" was one such session, dedicated toward perfecting the conduct of informed consent for research. The breakout session was attended by 15 insightful emergency medicine investigators, administrators, and ethicists. Issues of research information disclosure, subject comprehension, and the voluntariness of research participation were addressed. Consensus statements were developed and are discussed within this report.

摘要

2005年5月,《学术急诊医学》主办了一场为期一天的共识会议,该会议与2005年在纽约市举行的学术急诊医学协会会议联合举办。此次会议名为“复苏研究的伦理行为”,探讨了在急性护理环境中成功开展研究的各种问题。基于复苏研究特有的挑战,召开了多次重要的分组会议。“与受试者沟通”就是其中一场会议,致力于完善研究知情同意的实施过程。15位富有洞察力的急诊医学研究人员、管理人员和伦理学家参加了此次分组会议。会议讨论了研究信息披露、受试者理解以及研究参与的自愿性等问题。本报告中制定并讨论了共识声明。

相似文献

1
Communicating with subjects: special challenges for resuscitation research.与受试者沟通:复苏研究面临的特殊挑战。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1060-3. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.019.
2
Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.知情同意的例外情况:机构审查委员会的观点——平衡对受试者的风险、社区咨询及未来方向
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1050-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.015.
3
Using the exception from informed consent regulations in research.在研究中使用知情同意法规的例外情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1031-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.021.
4
Resuscitation research involving vulnerable populations: are additional protections needed for emergency exception from informed consent?涉及弱势群体的复苏研究:紧急情况下豁免知情同意是否需要额外保护?
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1071-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.020.
5
Does the emergency exception from informed consent process protect research subjects?知情同意程序的紧急例外情况是否能保护研究对象?
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1056-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.001.
6
Research conditions that qualify for emergency exception from informed consent.符合知情同意紧急例外情况的研究条件。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1040-4. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.022.
7
An ethical analysis of exception from informed consent regulations.对知情同意法规豁免情况的伦理分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1113-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.03.532.
8
Current status of research on the federal guidelines for performing research using an exception from informed consent.关于使用知情同意豁免进行研究的联邦指南的研究现状
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1022-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.012.
9
Researchers' understanding of the federal guidelines for waiver of and exception from informed consent.研究人员对联邦关于知情同意书豁免与例外的指导方针的理解。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1045-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.013.
10
Recruitment and communication process for participation in the 2005 AEM Consensus Conference on the Ethical Conduct of Resuscitation Research: methodology, challenges, lessons learned.参与2005年美国急诊医学学会复苏研究伦理行为共识会议的招募与沟通流程:方法、挑战及经验教训
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1027-30. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of out-of-hospital palliative emergency care depends on the expertise of the emergency medical team--a prospective multi-centre analysis.院外姑息急救护理质量取决于急救医疗团队的专业知识--一项前瞻性多中心分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Dec;17(12):1499-506. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0616-4. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
2
A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.一项关于机构审查委员会成员使用知情同意紧急例外情况审查研究提案的经验的定性研究。
J Med Ethics. 2007 May;33(5):289-93. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014878.