Bert Christoph, Metheany Katherine G, Doppke Karen, Chen George T Y
Biophysics, Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstrasse 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany.
Med Phys. 2005 Sep;32(9):2753-62. doi: 10.1118/1.1984263.
External beam irradiation requires precise positioning of the target relative to the treatment planning coordinate system. A three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging system for patient positioning has recently been installed in one of our linear accelerator (linac) rooms. The device utilizes close-range photogrammetry to generate a 3D model of the patient's surface. This geometric model can be made to look like a digital camera image if wrapped with a gray-level image (texture mapping) that shows surface coloration. The system is calibrated to the linac coordinate system and has been designed as a patient setup device. To reproduce patient position in fractionated radiotherapy, the daily patient surface model is registered to a previously recorded reference surface. Using surface registration, the system calculates the rigid-body transformation that minimizes the distance between the treatment and the reference surface models in a region-of-interest (ROI). This transformation is expressed as a set of new couch coordinates at which the patient position best matches with the reference data. If respiratory motion is a concern, the surface can be obtained with a gated acquisition at a specified phase of the respiratory cycle. To analyze the accuracy of the system, we performed several experiments with phantoms to assess stability, alignment accuracy, precision of the gating function, and surface topology. The reproducibility of surface measurements was tested for periods up to 57 h. Each recorded frame was registered to the reference surface to calculate the required couch adjustment. The system stability over this time period was better than 0.5 mm. To measure the accuracy of the system to detect and quantify patient shift relative to a reference image, we compared the shift detected by the surface imaging system with known couch transitions in a phantom study. The maximum standard deviation was 0.75 mm for the three translational degrees of freedom, and less than 0.1 degrees for each rotation. Surface model precision was tested against computed tomography (CT)-derived surface topology. The root-mean-square rms of the distance between the surfaces was 0.65 mm, excluding regions where beam hardening caused artifacts in the CT data. Measurements were made to test the gated acquisition mode. The time-dependent amplitude was measured with the surface imaging system and an established respiratory gating system based on infrared (IR)-marker detection. The measured motion trajectories from both systems were compared to the known trajectory of the stage. The standard deviations of the amplitude differences to the motor trajectory were 0.04 and 0.15 mm for the IR-marker system and the 3D surface imaging system, respectively. A limitation of the surface-imaging device is the frame rate of 6.5 Hz, because rapid changes of the motion trajectory cannot be detected. In conclusion, the system is accurate and sufficiently stable to be used in the clinic. The errors computed when comparing the surface model with CT geometry were submillimeter, and deviations in the alignment and gating-signal tests were of the same magnitude.
外照射放疗需要将靶区相对于治疗计划坐标系进行精确的定位。最近,我们在一台直线加速器(直线加速器)机房中安装了一套用于患者定位的三维(3D)表面成像系统。该设备利用近景摄影测量法生成患者表面的3D模型。如果用显示表面颜色的灰度图像(纹理映射)包裹,这个几何模型可以看起来像数码照片。该系统已校准到直线加速器坐标系,并被设计为一种患者摆位设备。为了在分次放疗中重现患者位置,每天的患者表面模型会与之前记录的参考表面进行配准。利用表面配准,系统计算出刚体变换,该变换能使感兴趣区域(ROI)内治疗表面模型与参考表面模型之间的距离最小化。这种变换表示为一组新的治疗床坐标,在这些坐标下患者位置与参考数据最佳匹配。如果呼吸运动是一个需要关注的问题,可以在呼吸周期的特定相位通过门控采集来获取表面。为了分析该系统的准确性,我们使用体模进行了多项实验,以评估稳定性、对准精度、门控功能的精度以及表面拓扑结构。对长达57小时的时间段内表面测量的可重复性进行了测试。将每个记录的帧与参考表面进行配准,以计算所需的治疗床调整。在此时间段内系统的稳定性优于0.5毫米。为了测量该系统检测和量化患者相对于参考图像的位移的准确性,我们在体模研究中将表面成像系统检测到的位移与已知的治疗床移动进行了比较。三个平移自由度的最大标准差为0.75毫米,每个旋转方向的标准差小于0.1度。针对计算机断层扫描(CT)得出的表面拓扑结构测试了表面模型精度。表面之间距离的均方根(rms)为0.65毫米,不包括CT数据中因束硬化导致伪影的区域。进行测量以测试门控采集模式。使用表面成像系统和基于红外(IR)标记检测的既定呼吸门控系统测量了随时间变化的幅度。将两个系统测量的运动轨迹与平台的已知轨迹进行了比较。IR标记系统和3D表面成像系统相对于电机轨迹的幅度差异的标准差分别为0.04和0.15毫米。表面成像设备的一个局限性是帧率为6.5Hz,因为无法检测到运动轨迹的快速变化。总之,该系统准确且足够稳定,可用于临床。将表面模型与CT几何结构进行比较时计算出的误差为亚毫米级,对准和门控信号测试中的偏差也处于相同量级。