Kim Keun Ho, Park Jeong Hwan, Ko Seok-Jae, Park Jae-Woo
Digital Health Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon 34054, Republic of Korea.
Korean Medicine Data Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon 34054, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 23;14(13):4465. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134465.
Abdominal examination by medical doctors is undertaken to observe abdominal shape and tenderness, but it is not typically quantified. Our goal was to explore the potential of physical metrics for identifying significant differences between individuals with fullness and discomfort in the chest and hypochondrium (FDCH) and those without FDCH. We utilized a 3D camera and a digital algometer to obtain these metrics. : We screened sixty participants with functional dyspepsia and complaints of epigastric discomfort or pain and sixty healthy participants without any digestive problems as a case-control study. We assessed the degree of agreement with FDCH of the abdominal signs diagnosed by traditional East Asian medicine doctors by performing clinical studies that involved assessing abdomens with the aforementioned devices. : Algometric features such as pressure, depth, and stiffness (defined as the pressure-to-depth ratio) were significantly lower in the FDCH group than in the non-FDCH group, with mean differences across locations ranging from -1.47 to -0.86, -8.75 to -4.46, and -0.31 to -0.12, respectively. Therefore, the physical algometric features decreased, the skin stiffness decreased, and the sensitivity increased. The point estimates for the mean differences in the geometric factor of depth between FDCH and non-FDCH across the locations ranged from -2.09 to -1.66, with generally smaller depth values in the FDCH group, indicating a flat or drooping abdominal shape. : The algometric and geometric metrics showed differences between the FDCH and non-FDCH groups, and various physical metrics will be expanded to identify other diseases through the collection of more clinical data in future. Trial registration/Protocol registration: CRIS and KCT0003369.
医生进行腹部检查以观察腹部形状和压痛情况,但通常不进行量化。我们的目标是探索身体测量指标在识别有胸胁满闷不适(FDCH)和无FDCH个体之间显著差异方面的潜力。我们使用3D相机和数字压力计来获取这些指标。我们筛选了60名功能性消化不良且有上腹部不适或疼痛主诉的参与者以及60名无任何消化问题的健康参与者作为病例对照研究。通过使用上述设备进行腹部评估的临床研究,我们评估了传统东亚医学医生诊断的腹部体征与FDCH的符合程度。压力、深度和硬度(定义为压力与深度之比)等压力计测量特征在FDCH组中显著低于非FDCH组,各部位的平均差异分别为-1.47至-0.86、-8.75至-4.46和-0.31至-0.12。因此,身体压力计测量特征降低,皮肤硬度降低,敏感性增加。FDCH组和非FDCH组在各部位深度几何因子的平均差异点估计值范围为-2.09至-1.66,FDCH组的深度值通常较小,表明腹部形状扁平或下垂。压力计测量指标和几何指标在FDCH组和非FDCH组之间存在差异,未来将通过收集更多临床数据来扩展各种身体测量指标以识别其他疾病。试验注册/方案注册:CRIS和KCT0003369。