Munson Benjamin, Nelson Peggy B
Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Oct;118(4):2607-17. doi: 10.1121/1.2005887.
This study examined the effect of noise on the identification of four synthetic speech continua (/ra/-/la/, /wa/-/ja/, /i/-/u/, and say-stay) by adults with cochlea implants (CIs) and adults with normal-hearing (NH) sensitivity in quiet and noise. Significant group-by-SNR interactions were found for endpoint identification accuracy for all continua except /i/-/u/. The CI listeners showed the least NH-like identification functions for the /ra/-/la/ and /wa/-/ja/ continua. In a second experiment, NH adults identified four- and eight-band cochlear implant stimulations of the four continua, to examine whether group differences in frequency selectivity could account for the group differences in the first experiment. Number of bands and SNR interacted significantly for /ra/-/la/, /wa/-/ja/, and say-stay endpoint identification; strongest effects were found for the /ra/-/la/ and say-stay continua. Results suggest that the speech features that are most vulnerable to misperception in noise by listeners with CIs are those whose acoustic cues are rapidly changing spectral patterns, like the formant transitions in the /wa/-/ja/ and /ra/-/la/ continua. However, the group differences in the first experiment cannot be wholly attributable to frequency selectivity differences, as the number of bands in the second experiment affected performance differently than suggested by group differences in the first experiment.
本研究考察了噪声对人工耳蜗(CI)植入者和听力正常(NH)成年人在安静和噪声环境中识别四种合成语音连续体(/ra/-/la/、/wa/-/ja/、/i/-/u/和say-stay)的影响。除了/i/-/u/之外,在所有连续体的端点识别准确性方面均发现了显著的组与信噪比交互作用。CI听众在/ra/-/la/和/wa/-/ja/连续体上表现出最不像NH的识别功能。在第二个实验中,NH成年人识别了四种连续体的四通道和八通道人工耳蜗刺激,以检验频率选择性的组间差异是否可以解释第一个实验中的组间差异。对于/ra/-/la/、/wa/-/ja/和say-stay端点识别,通道数量和信噪比存在显著交互作用;在/ra/-/la/和say-stay连续体上发现了最强的效应。结果表明,CI听众在噪声中最容易被误感知的语音特征是那些声学线索为快速变化频谱模式的特征,如/wa/-/ja/和/ra/-/la/连续体中的共振峰过渡。然而,第一个实验中的组间差异不能完全归因于频率选择性差异,因为第二个实验中的通道数量对表现的影响与第一个实验中的组间差异所表明的不同。