• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罪恶与生物伦理学:为何礼仪人类学是基础。

Sin and bioethics: why a liturgical anthropology is foundational.

作者信息

Engelhardt H Tristram

机构信息

Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Christ Bioeth. 2005 Aug;11(2):221-39. doi: 10.1080/13803600500203905.

DOI:10.1080/13803600500203905
PMID:16266973
Abstract

The project of articulating a coherent, canonical, content-full, secular morality-cum-bioethics fails, because it does not acknowledge sin, which is to say, it does not acknowledge the centrality of holiness, which is essential to a non-distorted understanding of human existence and of morality. Secular morality cannot establish a particular moral content, the harmony of the good and the right, or the necessary precedence of morality over prudence, because such is possible only in terms of an ultimate point of reference: God. The necessity of a rightly ordered appreciation of God places centrally the focus on holiness and the avoidance of sin. Because the cardinal relationship of creatures to their Creator is worship, and because the cardinal corporate act of human worship is the Liturgy, morality in general and bioethics in particular can be understood in terms of the conditions necessary, so as worthily to enter into Eucharistic liturgical participation. Morality can be summed up in terms of the requirements of ritual purity. A liturgical anthropology is foundational to an account of the content-full morality and bioethics that should bind humans, since humans are first and foremost creatures obliged to join in rightly ordered worship of their Creator. When humans worship correctly, when they avoid sin and pursue holiness, they participate in restoring created reality.

摘要

构建一种连贯、规范、内容充实的世俗道德兼生物伦理的计划失败了,因为它没有承认罪,也就是说,它没有承认圣洁的核心地位,而圣洁对于正确理解人类存在和道德至关重要。世俗道德无法确立特定的道德内容、善与正确的和谐,或道德相对于审慎的必然优先性,因为只有在一个终极参照点:上帝的层面上才有可能。正确有序地认识上帝的必要性将重点集中在圣洁和避免罪上。由于受造物与造物主的基本关系是崇拜,并且由于人类崇拜的基本集体行为是礼拜仪式,所以一般道德尤其是生物伦理可以根据为了能够适当地参与圣体礼拜仪式而必需的条件来理解。道德可以概括为仪式纯洁性的要求。一种礼拜仪式人类学是对应当约束人类的内容充实的道德和生物伦理的一种解释的基础,因为人类首先是有义务以正确有序的方式崇拜其造物主的受造物。当人类正确崇拜时,当他们避免犯罪并追求圣洁时,他们就参与到恢复被造的现实之中。

相似文献

1
Sin and bioethics: why a liturgical anthropology is foundational.罪恶与生物伦理学:为何礼仪人类学是基础。
Christ Bioeth. 2005 Aug;11(2):221-39. doi: 10.1080/13803600500203905.
2
Between morality and repentance: recapturing "sin" for bioethics.在道德与忏悔之间:为生物伦理学重拾“罪恶”
Christ Bioeth. 2005 Aug;11(2):93-132. doi: 10.1080/13803600500203806.
3
Moral philosophy and theology: why is there so little difference for Roman Catholics?道德哲学与神学:为何对罗马天主教徒来说二者差异如此之小?
Christ Bioeth. 2003 Aug-Dec;9(2-3):315-29. doi: 10.1076/chbi.9.2.315.30282.
4
Bioethics and sin.生物伦理学与罪恶。
Christ Bioeth. 2005 Aug;11(2):175-82. doi: 10.1080/13803600500203871.
5
Why physician-assisted suicide perpetuates the idolatory of medicine.为何医生协助自杀延续了对医学的盲目崇拜。
Christ Bioeth. 2003 Aug-Dec;9(2-3):245-71. doi: 10.1076/chbi.9.2.245.30278.
6
The significance of the concept of sin for bioethics.“罪”的概念对生物伦理学的意义。
Christ Bioeth. 2005 Aug;11(2):189-99. doi: 10.1080/13803600500203897.
7
Moral knowledge: some reflections on moral controversies, incompatible moral epistemologies, and the culture wars.道德知识:关于道德争议、不相容的道德认识论及文化战争的若干思考
Christ Bioeth. 2004 Jan-Apr;10(1):79-103. doi: 10.1080/13803600490489979.
8
Moral content, tradition, and grace: rethinking the possibility of a Christian bioethics.道德内涵、传统与恩泽:重新思考基督教生物伦理学的可能性
Christ Bioeth. 1995 Mar;1(1):29-47. doi: 10.1093/cb/1.1.29.
9
Medicine and the biomedical sciences after God: do right-worshipping Christians know more than others about the content of morality?
Christ Bioeth. 2002 Aug;8(2):209-19. doi: 10.1076/chbi.8.2.209.8751.
10
Freedom in responsibility: a response.责任中的自由:一种回应。
Christ Bioeth. 2005 Aug;11(2):167-73. doi: 10.1080/13803600500203863.