Chiu Thomas Tai Wing, Law Ellis Yuk Hung, Chiu Tony Hiu Fai
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005 Sep;35(9):567-71. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.9.567.
Cross-sectional comparative study.
To compare the performance of the deep cervical flexor muscles on the craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) in individuals with and without neck pain.
Significant weakness of the superficial neck muscles is often found in patients with neck pain. However, there is scant work on deep cervical flexors performance in subjects with chronic nonspecific neck pain.
Twenty asymptomatic subjects and 20 subjects with chronic neck pain (duration, > 3 months) were recruited. The CCFT was performed with the subject supine and required performing a gentle head-nodding action of craniocervical flexion (indicating yes) for 5 incremental stages of increasing difficulty. Each stage was held for 10 seconds, as guided by the pressure biofeedback unit. The data used for analysis were the highest pressure level that each subject was able to hold for 10 seconds, up to a maximum of 30 mmHg.
Reliability data obtained on 10 asymptomatic subjects indicated that the CCFT was reliable, with a kappa coefficient equal to 0.72. Subjects with chronic neck pain had significantly poorer (P < .001) performance on the CCFT (median pressure achieved, 24 mmHg) when compared with those in the asymptomatic group (median pressure achieved, 28 mmHg).
The results of this study demonstrated that patients with chronic neck pain had a poorer ability to perform the CCFT when compared with asymptomatic subjects. The study adds to the evidence that poor ability to perform the CCFT may be clinical evidence of an impairment that characterizes neck pain, regardless of origin.
横断面比较研究。
比较有颈部疼痛和无颈部疼痛个体在颅颈屈曲试验(CCFT)中颈深屈肌的表现。
颈部疼痛患者常出现颈部浅层肌肉明显无力。然而,关于慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者颈深屈肌表现的研究较少。
招募了20名无症状受试者和20名患有慢性颈部疼痛(病程>3个月)的受试者。CCFT在受试者仰卧位时进行,要求其进行难度逐渐增加的5个递增阶段的轻柔点头动作(表示“是”),即颅颈屈曲。在压力生物反馈装置的引导下,每个阶段保持10秒。用于分析的数据是每个受试者能够保持10秒的最高压力水平,最高可达30 mmHg。
对10名无症状受试者获得的可靠性数据表明,CCFT是可靠的,kappa系数为0.72。与无症状组(达到的中位压力为28 mmHg)相比,慢性颈部疼痛受试者在CCFT上的表现明显更差(P <.001)(达到的中位压力为24 mmHg)。
本研究结果表明,与无症状受试者相比,慢性颈部疼痛患者进行CCFT的能力较差。该研究进一步证明,无论病因如何,CCFT能力差可能是颈部疼痛特征性损伤的临床证据。