Price Bertram, Ware Adam
Price Associates Inc., White Plains, NY 10061, USA.
Risk Anal. 2005 Aug;25(4):937-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00643.x.
The mesothelioma epidemic in the United States, which peaked during the 2000-2004 period, can be traced to high-level asbestos exposures experienced by males in occupational settings prior to the full recognition of the disease-causing potential of asbestos and the establishment of enforceable asbestos exposure limits by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 1971. Many individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma where asbestos has been identified as a contributing cause of the disease have filed claims seeking compensation from asbestos settlement trusts or through the court system. An individual with mesothelioma typically has been exposed to asbestos in more than one setting and from more than one asbestos product. Apportioning risk for mesothelioma among contributing factors is an ongoing problem faced by occupational disease compensation boards, juries, parties responsible for paying damages, and currently by the U.S. Senate in its efforts to formulate a bill establishing an asbestos settlement trust. In this article we address the following question: If an individual with mesothelioma where asbestos has been identified as a contributing cause were to be compensated for his or her disease, how should that compensation be apportioned among those responsible for the asbestos exposures? For the purposes of apportionment, we assume that asbestos is the only cause of mesothelioma and that every asbestos exposure contributes, albeit differentially, to the risk. We use an extension of the mesothelioma risk model initially proposed in the early 1980s to quantify the contribution to risk of each exposure as a percentage of the total risk. The percentage for each specific discrete asbestos exposure depends on the start and end dates, the intensity, and the asbestos fiber type for the exposure. We provide justification for the use of the mesothelioma risk model for apportioning risk and discuss how to assess uncertainty associated with its application.
美国间皮瘤疫情在2000 - 2004年期间达到顶峰,这可追溯到男性在职业环境中接触高剂量石棉的情况,当时人们尚未充分认识到石棉的致病潜力,职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)也未在1971年制定可执行的石棉接触限值。许多被诊断为间皮瘤且已确定石棉为致病因素之一的个人,已提出索赔要求,向石棉和解信托基金索赔或通过法院系统索赔。间皮瘤患者通常在不止一种环境中接触过石棉,且接触过不止一种石棉产品。在职业病赔偿委员会、陪审团、负责支付损害赔偿金的各方以及目前美国参议院努力制定一项设立石棉和解信托基金法案的过程中,如何在多种致病因素之间分配间皮瘤风险一直是个难题。在本文中,我们探讨以下问题:如果一名被诊断为间皮瘤且已确定石棉为致病因素之一的患者因该疾病获得赔偿,那么这笔赔偿应如何在那些导致石棉接触的责任方之间分配?为了进行分配,我们假设石棉是间皮瘤的唯一病因,且每次石棉接触对风险都有贡献,尽管贡献程度不同。我们使用20世纪80年代初最初提出的间皮瘤风险模型的扩展版本,将每次接触对风险的贡献量化为总风险的百分比。每次特定离散石棉接触的百分比取决于接触的开始和结束日期、强度以及石棉纤维类型。我们为使用间皮瘤风险模型进行风险分配提供了依据,并讨论了如何评估与其应用相关的不确定性