Grova C, Daunizeau J, Lina J-M, Bénar C G, Benali H, Gotman J
Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, EEG Department, Room 009d, 3801 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4.
Neuroimage. 2006 Feb 1;29(3):734-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.053. Epub 2005 Nov 3.
Performing an accurate localization of sources of interictal spikes from EEG scalp measurements is of particular interest during the presurgical investigation of epilepsy. The purpose of this paper is to study the ability of six distributed source localization methods to recover extended sources of activated cortex. Due to the frequent lack of a gold standard to evaluate source localization methods, our evaluation was performed in a controlled environment using realistic simulations of EEG interictal spikes, involving several anatomical locations with several spatial extents. Simulated data were corrupted by physiological EEG noise. Simulations involving pairs of sources with the same amplitude were also studied. In addition to standard validation criteria (e.g., geodesic distance or mean square error), we proposed an original criterion dedicated to assess detection accuracy, based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Six source localization methods were evaluated: the minimum norm, the minimum norm weighted by multivariate source prelocalization (MSP), cortical LORETA with or without additional minimum norm regularization, and two derivations of the maximum entropy on the mean (MEM) approach. Results showed that LORETA-based and MEM-based methods were able to accurately recover sources of different spatial extents, with the exception of sources in temporo-mesial and fronto-mesial regions. Several spurious sources were generated by those methods, however, whereas methods using the MSP always located very accurately the maximum of activity but not its spatial extent. These findings suggest that one should always take into account the results from different localization methods when analyzing real interictal spikes.
在癫痫术前检查期间,通过脑电图头皮测量对发作间期棘波源进行准确的定位尤为重要。本文旨在研究六种分布式源定位方法恢复激活皮层扩展源的能力。由于经常缺乏评估源定位方法的金标准,我们在可控环境下利用脑电图发作间期棘波的逼真模拟进行评估,模拟涉及多个具有不同空间范围的解剖位置。模拟数据受到生理性脑电图噪声的干扰。还研究了涉及具有相同幅度的源对的模拟。除了标准验证标准(如测地距离或均方误差)外,我们还基于接收器操作特征(ROC)分析提出了一种专门用于评估检测准确性的原始标准。对六种源定位方法进行了评估:最小范数法、通过多变量源预定位加权的最小范数法(MSP)、带或不带额外最小范数正则化的皮层LORETA以及均值最大熵(MEM)方法的两种衍生方法。结果表明,基于LORETA和基于MEM的方法能够准确恢复不同空间范围的源,但颞中回和额中回区域的源除外。然而,这些方法产生了一些伪源,而使用MSP的方法总能非常准确地定位活动最大值,但不能确定其空间范围。这些发现表明,在分析实际发作间期棘波时,应始终考虑不同定位方法的结果。