Merriman William E, Evey Julie A
Department of Psychology, Kent State University, OH 44242, USA.
Child Dev. 2005 Nov-Dec;76(6):1185-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00844.x.
If after teaching a label for 1 object, a speaker does not name a nearby object, 3-year-olds tend to reject the label for the nearby object (W.E. Merriman, J.M. Marazita, L.H. Jarvis, J.A. Evey-Burkey, and M. Biggins, 1995a). In Studies 1 (5-year-olds) and 3 (3-year-olds), this effect depended on object similarity. In Study 2, when a speaker used a label without teaching it, 5-year-olds showed no passover effect. 3-year-olds showed none for inanimate objects, but one for animate objects. When extraneous factors that may have promoted animate object individuation were eliminated (Study 3), 3-year-olds showed the effect when a label was taught, but not when it was merely used. Children honor rational restrictions on when the unacceptability of a name can be inferred from its nonoccurrence.
如果在为一个物体教授了一个标签之后,说话者没有说出附近另一个物体的名称,3岁的孩子往往会拒绝接受给附近物体的标签(W.E. 梅里曼、J.M. 马拉齐塔、L.H. 贾维斯、J.A. 埃维 - 伯基和M. 比金斯,1995a)。在研究1(5岁儿童)和研究3(3岁儿童)中,这种效应取决于物体的相似性。在研究2中,当说话者使用一个未经过教授的标签时,5岁的孩子没有表现出越过效应。3岁的孩子对无生命物体没有表现出越过效应,但对有生命物体表现出越过效应。当消除了可能促进有生命物体个体化的外部因素后(研究3),3岁的孩子在标签被教授时表现出这种效应,但在标签只是被使用时则没有。孩子们认可关于何时可以从一个名称未出现推断其不可接受性的合理限制。