Suppr超能文献

用于人工授精的公猪及精液中衣原体的流行情况。

Prevalence of chlamydiae in boars and semen used for artificial insemination.

作者信息

Kauffold Johannes, Melzer Falk, Henning Klaus, Schulze Katrin, Leiding Claus, Sachse Konrad

机构信息

Large Animal Clinic for Theriogenology and Ambulatory Services, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 29, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Theriogenology. 2006 Jun;65(9):1750-8. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.10.010. Epub 2005 Nov 8.

Abstract

Although there are indications for venereal transmission of chlamydiae in pigs, direct diagnostic evidence on the presence of these bacteria in boars and boar semen in particular is still incomplete. We investigated boars from two studs (A, B) in semen (A: n = 174; B: n = 100) and faeces (A: n = 174; B: n = 24) for chlamydiae using ompA-PCR and partial ompA gene sequencing. Additionally, blood serum was examined for chlamydial antibodies using an indirect ELISA (A: n = 171; B: n = 62). Chlamydiae were found in 9 (5.2%) and 24 (24.0%) semen specimens, and in 71 (40.1%) and 2 (8.3%) faecal samples from boars of stud A and B, respectively. Regarding individual chlamydial species, Chlamydophila psittaci and Chlamydia suis were identified most frequently, with the former predominating in semen (in 23 out of 33 positive samples) and the latter in faeces (68/73). In contrast, Chlamydophila pecorum was found only sporadically. Chlamydial antibodies were detected in 80 (46.8%) and 6 (9.7%) boars of stud A and B, respectively. No correlation was observed between the data from serology and PCR of semen or faeces in either of the studs. In conclusion, detection of chlamydiae in semen of boars suggests a potential for venereal transmission. Whether the high overall prevalence of chlamydial infections reflects a general situation in boars needs to be investigated. Serological testing failed to identify boars shedding chlamydiae in their semen.

摘要

尽管有迹象表明猪衣原体可通过性传播,但关于这些细菌特别是在公猪和公猪精液中存在的直接诊断证据仍不完整。我们使用ompA-PCR和ompA基因部分测序,对来自两个种猪场(A、B)的公猪精液(A:n = 174;B:n = 100)和粪便(A:n = 174;B:n = 24)进行衣原体检测。此外,使用间接ELISA检测血清中的衣原体抗体(A:n = 171;B:n = 62)。在种猪场A和B公猪的精液样本中,分别有9份(5.2%)和24份(24.0%)检测到衣原体,粪便样本中分别有71份(40.1%)和2份(8.3%)检测到衣原体。关于衣原体的具体种类,鹦鹉热嗜衣原体和猪衣原体最为常见,前者在精液中占主导(33份阳性样本中的23份),后者在粪便中占主导(73份中的68份)。相比之下,猪嗜衣原体仅偶尔被发现。在种猪场A和B的公猪中,分别有80头(46.8%)和6头(9.7%)检测到衣原体抗体。在任何一个种猪场中,血清学数据与精液或粪便的PCR数据之间均未观察到相关性。总之,在公猪精液中检测到衣原体表明存在性传播的可能性。衣原体感染的总体高流行率是否反映了公猪的普遍情况有待研究。血清学检测未能识别出精液中 shedding chlamydiae(此处可能有误,推测为“排出衣原体”)的公猪。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验