Piccoli Giorgina Barbara, Soragna Giorgio, Putaggio Stefania, Mezza Elisabetta, Burdese Manuel, Vespertino Elisa, Bonetto Antonella, Jeantet Alberto, Segoloni Giuseppe Paolo, Piccoli Giuseppe
Internal Medicine Department, University of Turin, Italy.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Feb;21(2):499-509. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi238. Epub 2005 Nov 9.
Organ shortage for transplantation is a crucial problem; educational interventions may increase donations and decrease opposition.
To test the efficacy of an educational programme on opinions on organ transplantation and kidney donation.
Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: eight intervention and eight control schools were randomly selected from the 33 public schools that agreed to participate. Targets: students in the last 2 years of secondary school (17-18 years); seven schools per group completed the study. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMME:
first questionnaire (anonymous); 2 h lesson in each class; 2 h general session with patients and experts; second questionnaire.
questionnaires.
Differences between questionnaires (comparative analysis); interest; satisfaction with the programme; (cross-sectional analysis).
1776 first, 1467 second questionnaires were retrieved. Living kidney donation: at baseline 78.8% of students would donate a kidney to a relative/friend in need. The answers were unaffected by type of school but depended on sex (females more prone to donate, P<0.001); the answers did not change after the lessons. Cadaveric kidney donation: baseline opinions were mixed (intervention schools: 31.5% yes, 33.7% no, 34.8% uncertain), depending on type of school (classical-scientific high schools more positive than technical institutes, P<0.001), sex (males more prone to donate, P<0.001). Answers on living and cadaveric donation were correlated (P<0.001). The educational intervention increased favourable (31.5 to 42.9%) and uncertain (34.8 to 41.1%) opinions and decreased negative ones (33.7 to 16%) (P<0.001).
Educational interventions are effective in increasing interest and improving opinions about cadaveric organ donation.
移植器官短缺是一个关键问题;教育干预可能会增加器官捐赠并减少反对意见。
测试一项教育计划对器官移植和肾脏捐赠观点的影响。
整群随机对照试验:从同意参与的33所公立学校中随机选择8所干预学校和8所对照学校。目标人群:中学最后两年的学生(17 - 18岁);每组7所学校完成研究。教育计划:
第一份问卷(匿名);每班2小时课程;与患者和专家进行2小时的全体会议;第二份问卷。
问卷。
问卷之间的差异(比较分析);兴趣;对该计划的满意度(横断面分析)。
回收1776份第一份问卷,1467份第二份问卷。活体肾脏捐赠:基线时,78.8%的学生表示会将肾脏捐给有需要的亲属/朋友。答案不受学校类型影响,但取决于性别(女性更倾向于捐赠,P<0.001);课程结束后答案没有变化。尸体肾脏捐赠:基线观点不一(干预学校:31.5%表示愿意,33.7%表示不愿意,34.8%不确定),取决于学校类型(古典 - 科学高中比技术学院更积极,P<0.001)、性别(男性更倾向于捐赠,P<0.001)。活体和尸体捐赠的答案具有相关性(P<0.001)。教育干预增加了支持意见(从31.5%增至42.9%)和不确定意见(从34.8%增至41.1%),减少了反对意见(从33.7%降至16%)(P<0.001)。
教育干预在提高对尸体器官捐赠的兴趣和改善相关观点方面是有效的。