Hollander Priscilla, Nicewander David, Couch Carl, Winter David, Herrin Jeph, Haydar Ziad, Ballard David J
Baylor-Ruth Collins Diabetes Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Health Care System, 8080 North Central Expressway, Dallas, TX 75206, USA.
Am J Med Qual. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):344-52. doi: 10.1177/1062860605280205.
Diabetes care in the United States is suboptimal. Although closed-panel health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) report performance superior to national norms, fee-for-service performance is uncertain. To address this issue, 3 outcome and 5 process indicators were measured for 2010 Medicare diabetes patients across 22 sites in a large, fee-for-service primary care group practice. American Diabetes Association standards for glycemic control, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and blood pressure were met by 53%, 46%, and 19% of patients, respectively. Diabetes Quality Improvement Project/Alliance poor control markers for the same measures were exceeded by 9%, 20%, and 54% of patients. Chart abstraction demonstrated annual eye examination, foot examination, and nephropathy screening rates of 16%, 49%, and 38%, while Medicare claims showed an annual eye examination rate of 63%. Observed processes and outcomes in this fee-for-service setting were superior to reported national performance and similar to the best performance in staff-model HMOs and the VA.
美国的糖尿病护理情况并不理想。尽管封闭式健康维护组织(HMOs)和退伍军人事务部(VA)报告称其表现优于国家规范,但按服务收费的表现尚不确定。为解决这一问题,在一个大型的按服务收费的初级保健团体实践中,对22个地点的2010名医疗保险糖尿病患者测量了3项结果指标和5项过程指标。分别有53%、46%和19%的患者达到了美国糖尿病协会关于血糖控制、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和血压的标准。对于相同指标,分别有9%、20%和54%的患者超过了糖尿病质量改进项目/联盟的控制不佳指标。病历摘要显示,年度眼部检查、足部检查和肾病筛查率分别为16%、49%和38%,而医疗保险理赔显示年度眼部检查率为63%。在这种按服务收费的环境中观察到的过程和结果优于报告的国家表现,并且与员工型HMOs和VA中的最佳表现相似。