McDevitt-Murphy Meghan E, Weathers Frank W, Adkins Jennifer W
Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Alabama, USA.
J Trauma Stress. 2005 Feb;18(1):63-7. doi: 10.1002/jts.20003.
This study examined the Trauma Symptom Inventory (TSI; Briere, 1995) in a sample of 62 trauma-exposed community residents (80% Caucasian, 89% women), including 16 who had posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD and non-PTSD groups differed on seven TSI clinical scales and one validity scale, with effect sizes (r) ranging from 0.26 to 0.53. The largest effect sizes and best diagnostic utility were found for the Defensive Avoidance and Anxious Arousal scales. Diagnostic utility analyses suggest that TSI subscales in isolation are not superior to existing measures of PTSD. A logistic regression using the five most discriminating TSI scales produced a correct classification rate of 85.5%. TSI scales also demonstrated good convergent validity with other measures of PTSD. Overall, the results provide preliminary support for the use of the TSI in the assessment of PTSD.
本研究在62名遭受创伤的社区居民样本中对创伤症状量表(TSI;布里尔,1995年)进行了检验,这些居民中80%为白种人,89%为女性,其中16人患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。PTSD组和非PTSD组在TSI的七个临床量表和一个效度量表上存在差异,效应量(r)范围为0.26至0.53。防御性回避量表和焦虑性唤醒量表的效应量最大,诊断效用最佳。诊断效用分析表明,单独使用TSI分量表并不优于现有的PTSD测量方法。使用五个最具区分性的TSI量表进行逻辑回归分析,得出的正确分类率为85.5%。TSI量表与其他PTSD测量方法也显示出良好的收敛效度。总体而言,研究结果为TSI在PTSD评估中的应用提供了初步支持。