Edejer Tessa Tan-Torres, Aikins Moses, Black Robert, Wolfson Lara, Hutubessy Raymond, Evans David B
Costs, Effectiveness, Expenditure and Priority Setting, Health Systems Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMJ. 2005 Nov 19;331(7526):1177. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38652.550278.7C. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
To determine the costs and effectiveness of selected child health interventions-namely, case management of pneumonia, oral rehydration therapy, supplementation or fortification of staple foods with vitamin A or zinc, provision of supplementary food with counselling on nutrition, and immunisation against measles.
Cost effectiveness analysis.
Efficacy data came from published systematic reviews and before and after evaluations of programmes. For resource inputs, quantities came from literature and expert opinion, and prices from the World Health Organization Choosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE) database,
Cost effectiveness ratios clustered in three groups, with fortification with zinc or vitamin A as the most cost effective intervention, and provision of supplementary food and counselling on nutrition as the least cost effective. Between these were oral rehydration therapy, case management of pneumonia, vitamin A or zinc supplementation, and measles immunisation.
On the grounds of cost effectiveness, micronutrients and measles immunisation should be provided routinely to all children, in addition to oral rehydration therapy and case management of pneumonia for those who are sick. The challenge of malnutrition is not well addressed by existing interventions.
确定某些儿童健康干预措施的成本和效果,即肺炎病例管理、口服补液疗法、用维生素A或锌对主食进行补充或强化、提供补充食品并给予营养咨询以及麻疹免疫接种。
成本效益分析。
疗效数据来自已发表的系统评价以及项目的前后评估。对于资源投入,数量来自文献和专家意见,价格来自世界卫生组织“选择具有成本效益的干预措施”(WHO-CHOICE)数据库。
成本效益比分为三组,用锌或维生素A强化是最具成本效益的干预措施,而提供补充食品和营养咨询是最不具成本效益的。介于两者之间的是口服补液疗法、肺炎病例管理、维生素A或锌补充以及麻疹免疫接种。
基于成本效益,除了为患病儿童提供口服补液疗法和肺炎病例管理外,还应常规为所有儿童提供微量营养素和麻疹免疫接种。现有干预措施未能很好地应对营养不良的挑战。