Gorelick Marc H, Alpern Elizabeth R, Singh Tasmeen, Snowdon Donald, Holubkov Richard, Dean J Michael, Kuppermann Nathan
Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin and Children's Research Institute (MHG), Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Dec;12(12):1195-200. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.028. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
To determine the availability and completeness of selected data elements from administrative and clinical sources for emergency department (ED) visits in a national pediatric research network.
This was a retrospective study of 25 EDs in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. Data were obtained from two sources at each ED: 1) extant electronic administrative data for all visits during a 12-month period in 2002 and 2) data abstracted from medical records by trained abstractors for visits during ten randomly selected days over a three-month period in 2003. Epidemiologic data were obtained for all visits and additional clinical data for patients with two target conditions: asthma and fractures.
A total of 749,036 visits were analyzed from administrative sources and 12,756 medical records abstracted. Data availability varied by element, method of capture, and site. From administrative sources, data on insurance type were the most complete (1.3% overall missing; range, 0%-18.5% for individual sites), whereas mode of arrival (25.5% missing) and triage time (65.3%) were the least complete. Disposition was missing in only 1.2% of medical records overall (range, 0%-5%) and diagnosis was missing in 3% (range, 0%-16%); these were missing from 14.4% and 10.5%, respectively, of administrative sources. Among visits with injury diagnoses, E-codes were missing in 27% of cases. For patients with asthma (n = 861), documentation of specific elements of the clinical examination by nurses and physicians was also variable.
Data elements important in emergency medical care for children are frequently missing in existing administrative and medical record sources; completeness varies widely across EDs. Researchers must be aware of these limitations in the use of existing data when planning studies.
确定在一个全国性儿科研究网络中,从行政和临床来源获取的急诊科(ED)就诊选定数据元素的可用性和完整性。
这是一项对儿科急诊护理应用研究网络中25个急诊科的回顾性研究。数据从每个急诊科的两个来源获取:1)2002年12个月期间所有就诊的现有电子行政数据,以及2)经过培训的摘要员从2003年三个月期间随机选择的十天内就诊的病历中提取的数据。获取了所有就诊的流行病学数据以及患有两种目标疾病(哮喘和骨折)患者的额外临床数据。
共分析了来自行政来源的749,036次就诊以及提取的12,756份病历。数据可用性因元素、获取方法和地点而异。从行政来源来看,保险类型数据最为完整(总体缺失率为1.3%;各站点范围为0%-18.5%),而到达方式(缺失率为25.5%)和分诊时间(缺失率为65.3%)最不完整。总体而言,只有1.2%的病历中处置信息缺失(范围为0%-5%),诊断信息缺失率为3%(范围为0%-16%);行政来源中分别有14.4%和10.5%缺失这些信息。在有损伤诊断的就诊中,27%的病例缺少E编码。对于哮喘患者(n = 861),护士和医生对临床检查特定元素的记录也存在差异。
儿童急诊医疗护理中重要的数据元素在现有行政和病历来源中经常缺失;各急诊科的完整性差异很大。研究人员在规划研究时必须意识到使用现有数据时的这些局限性。