Wing Andrew, Hill-Taylor Barbara, Sketris Ingrid, Smith Jeanne, Stewart Sam, Hurley Katrina F
, BSc, is a medical student in the Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2012 Jul;65(4):265-71. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v65i4.1156.
Research exploring the agreement between traditional medication records and electronic records generated by an automated dispensing device has been limited.
To evaluate the extent of agreement between medication administration records written in paper-based emergency department charts and records generated by an automated dispensing device with regard to the presence or absence of a single, prespecified medication.
Medication administration records in paper-based emergency department charts and medication dispensation records generated by an automated dispensing device were evaluated for concordance. The primary outcome measure was agreement between the 2 sources with regard to the presence or absence of a record for salbutamol by metered-dose inhaler (MDI) for randomly selected patients who presented to a pediatric emergency department with wheeze-related illness from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009.
In total, 1172 patient visits met the inclusion criteria. Of these, records for 1013 visits showed agreement between the paper-based emergency department chart and the dispensation record of the automated dispensing device (kappa = 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.75). This value did not meet the target kappa of 0.80. Stratification by time of day, day of week, month, season, or year of presentation at triage or by triage level or disposition (whether or not the patient was admitted to the hospital ward) did not significantly affect the level of agreement between the 2 sources.
Agreement between records of salbutamol MDI administration in paper-based charts and dispensation records from an automated dispensing device was substantial, but discrepancies were present. There are significant quality management, legal, clinical, and research reasons to strive for concordance between multiple records with respect to medication use in the emergency department. Data generated by automated dispensing devices have potential value for research, but their strengths and limitations need to be understood.
探索传统药物记录与自动配药设备生成的电子记录之间一致性的研究有限。
评估纸质急诊科病历中书写的用药记录与自动配药设备生成的记录在单一指定药物的有无方面的一致程度。
对纸质急诊科病历中的用药记录和自动配药设备生成的药物配药记录进行一致性评估。主要结局指标是2008年1月1日至2009年12月31日随机选择的因喘息相关疾病就诊于儿科急诊科的患者使用定量吸入器(MDI)沙丁胺醇记录的有无,这两个来源之间的一致性。
共有1172次患者就诊符合纳入标准。其中,1013次就诊的记录显示纸质急诊科病历与自动配药设备的配药记录一致(kappa = 0.71,95%置信区间0.67 - 0.75)。该值未达到目标kappa值0.80。按分诊时的时间、星期几、月份、季节或年份分层,或按分诊级别或处置情况(患者是否入住医院病房)分层,均未显著影响这两个来源之间的一致程度。
纸质病历中沙丁胺醇MDI用药记录与自动配药设备的配药记录之间的一致性较高,但仍存在差异。在急诊科,为实现多份用药记录之间的一致性,存在重大的质量管理、法律、临床和研究方面的理由。自动配药设备生成的数据具有潜在的研究价值,但需要了解其优势和局限性。