Suppr超能文献

通过解构文化/自然二元论构建批判性生物伦理学。

Constructing critical bioethics by deconstructing culture/nature dualism.

作者信息

Twine Richard

机构信息

Institute for Environment, Philosophy and Public Policy IEPPP & ESRC Centre for the Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics CESA Gen, Lancaster University, UK.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8(3):285-95. doi: 10.1007/s11019-004-7812-2.

Abstract

This paper seeks to respond to some of the recent criticisms directed toward bioethics by offering a contribution to a "critical bioethics". Here this concept is principally defined in terms of the three features of interdisciplinarity, self-reflexivity and the avoidance of uncritical complicity. In a partial reclamation of the ideas of V.R. Potter, it is argued that a critical bioethics requires a meaningful challenge to culture/nature dualism, expressed in bioethics as the distinction between medical ethics and ecological ethics. Such a contesting of the "bio" in bioethics arrests its ethical bracketing of environmental and animal ethics. Taken together, the triadic definition of a critical bioethics offered here provides a potential framework with which to fend off critiques of commercial capture or of being "too close to science" commonly directed toward bioethics.

摘要

本文旨在通过对“批判性生物伦理学”做出贡献,回应近期针对生物伦理学的一些批评。在此,这一概念主要依据跨学科性、自我反思性以及避免不加批判的同谋这三个特征来界定。在对V.R. 波特的观点进行部分 reclaimation(此处原文可能有误,推测是“reclamation”,意为“回收、开垦、改造”等,这里结合语境可理解为“重新阐释”)时,有人认为批判性生物伦理学需要对文化/自然二元论提出有意义的挑战,这种二元论在生物伦理学中表现为医学伦理学与生态伦理学的区分。对生物伦理学中“生物”的这种质疑阻止了其对环境伦理学和动物伦理学的伦理归类。总体而言,这里给出的批判性生物伦理学的三元定义提供了一个潜在框架,用以抵御通常针对生物伦理学的商业俘获或“过于贴近科学”的批评。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验