Harkins Kelly M, Mattacola Carl G, Uhl Timothy L, Malone Terry R, McCrory Jean L
University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0200, USA.
J Athl Train. 2005 Jul-Sep;40(3):191-4.
Muscle fatigue is generally categorized in 2 ways: that caused by peripheral weakness (peripheral fatigue) and that caused by a progressive failure of voluntary neural drive (central fatigue). Numerous variables have been studied in conjunction with fatigue protocols, including postural stability, maximum voluntary contraction force, and reaction time. When torque recordings fall below 50% of a maximum voluntary contraction, the muscle is described as fatigued, but whether this value is a good indicator of fatigue has not been studied.
To compare the effects of 2 ankle musculature fatigue protocols (30% and 50%) on the duration of postural stability dysfunction.
To assess differences between the 30% and 50% fatigue protocols, we calculated a 1 between-groups factor (subjects) and 2 within-groups factors (fatigue, test) analysis of variance.
E.J. Nutter Athletic Training Facility.
Twenty subjects (10 men, 10 women; age = 21.15 +/- 2.23 years; height = 172.97 +/- 9.86 cm; mass = 70.62 +/- 14.60 kg) volunteered for this study. Subjects had no history of lower extremity injury, vestibular or balance disorders, functional ankle instability, or head injury in the past 6 months.
INTERVENTION(S): On separate days, subjects performed isokinetic fatiguing contractions of the plantar flexors and dorsiflexors in a 30% protocol (70% decrease in strength) and a 50% protocol (50% decrease in strength).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Baseline and postfatigue postural stability scores were determined before and after the isokinetic fatiguing contractions. Plantar-flexion peak-torque measurements were obtained for the 2 fatiguing protocols. Three prefatigue and 12 postfatigue postural stability trials were recorded. Velocities for testing were 60 degrees /s for plantar flexion and 120 degrees /s for dorsiflexion.
Sway velocity was significantly greater when the ankle was fatigued to 30% (1.56 degrees /s) than in the 50% condition (1.36 degrees /s). For the 30% protocol, sway was significantly impaired when the pretest condition (1.19 degrees /s) was compared with posttest trial 1 (2.34 degrees /s), trial 2 (2.37 degrees /s), and trial 3 (1.71 degrees /s). For the 50% protocol, sway was significantly impaired when the pretest condition (1.27 degrees /s) was compared with posttest trial 1 (2.02 degrees /s).
The 30% fatigue protocol resulted in significantly longer impairment of postural stability than the 50% protocol. Because the 30% protocol resulted in a greater effect but was relatively short-lived (approximately 75 to 90 s), it is more useful for research purposes.
肌肉疲劳一般通过两种方式进行分类:由外周肌无力引起的(外周疲劳)和由自主神经驱动的渐进性衰竭引起的(中枢疲劳)。许多变量已与疲劳方案一起进行了研究,包括姿势稳定性、最大自主收缩力和反应时间。当扭矩记录低于最大自主收缩的50%时,肌肉被描述为疲劳,但该值是否是疲劳的良好指标尚未得到研究。
比较两种踝关节肌肉疲劳方案(30%和50%)对姿势稳定性功能障碍持续时间的影响。
为了评估30%和50%疲劳方案之间的差异,我们计算了一个组间因素(受试者)和两个组内因素(疲劳、测试)的方差分析。
E.J.纳特运动训练设施。
20名受试者(10名男性,10名女性;年龄=21.15±2.23岁;身高=172.97±9.86厘米;体重=70.62±14.60千克)自愿参加本研究。受试者在过去6个月内无下肢损伤、前庭或平衡障碍、功能性踝关节不稳或头部损伤史。
在不同的日子里,受试者分别按照30%方案(力量下降70%)和50%方案(力量下降50%)进行跖屈肌和背屈肌的等速疲劳收缩。
在等速疲劳收缩前后测定基线和疲劳后姿势稳定性评分。获取两种疲劳方案的跖屈峰值扭矩测量值。记录3次疲劳前和12次疲劳后姿势稳定性试验。测试速度为跖屈60度/秒,背屈120度/秒。
当踝关节疲劳至30%时的摆动速度(1.56度/秒)显著高于50%时的情况(1.36度/秒)。对于30%方案,与测试前状态(摆动速度为1.19度/秒)相比,测试后第1次试验(2.34度/秒)、第2次试验(2.37度/秒)和第3次试验(1.71度/秒)时的摆动明显受损。对于50%方案,与测试前状态(摆动速度为1.27度/秒)相比,测试后第1次试验(2.02度/秒)时的摆动明显受损。
30%疲劳方案导致姿势稳定性受损的持续时间明显长于50%方案。由于30%方案产生的效果更大,但持续时间相对较短(约75至90秒),因此对研究目的更有用。