Salmas Constantinos E, Androutsopoulos George P
School of Chemical Engineering, Chemical Process Engineering Laboratory, National Technical University of Athens, GR 15 780 Athens, Greece.
Langmuir. 2005 Nov 22;21(24):11146-60. doi: 10.1021/la0508644.
A gas adsorption rigid spheres model (RSM) was incorporated into the CPSM model (corrugated pore structure model) to correlate the pore surface areas obtained from the BET and CPSM methods. The latter is a method simulating the gas sorption hysteresis loop and enables the evaluation of surface areas S(CPSM) through the integration of the pertinent pore size distributions. Thus, S(CPSM) values are inherently influenced by pore curvature. The new CPSM-RSM version estimates surface areas S(CPSMfs) that are independent of pore curvature and can be compared with the pertinent S(BET) values. The RSM exploits the fact that a curved pore surface accommodates fewer molecules, assumed to behave as rigid spheres, than an equal flat one. Thus, the RSM accounts for a higher molecular surface coverage Ac (nm2/molec.) in pores with marked curvature than that (i.e., Af) on a flat surface. The ratio Ac/Af for nitrogen adsorbed on single pore sizes varies in the range Ac/Af = 1.44-1.03 for pore sizes D = 1.5-15 nm, respectively. Also for D = 1.5-5.0 nm the S(CPSMfs) and S(BET) values are lower by approximately 10-45% than the S(CPSM) estimates. From the application of the CPSM-RSM model on several porous materials exhibiting all known types of sorption hysteresis loops, it was confirmed that S(BET) approximately S(CPSMfs) (+/-5%) and (S(CPSM) - S(BET))/S(BET) = 3-68% for the materials examined. In conclusion, the BET method may produce quite conservative surface area estimates for materials exhibiting pore structures with appreciable pore curvature, whereas the CPSM-RSM model can reliably predict both S(CPSM) and S(CPSMfs) = S(BET) values.
将气体吸附刚性球模型(RSM)纳入CPSM模型(波纹孔结构模型),以关联通过BET法和CPSM法获得的孔表面积。后者是一种模拟气体吸附滞后回线的方法,能够通过对相关孔径分布进行积分来评估表面积S(CPSM)。因此,S(CPSM)值本质上受孔曲率的影响。新的CPSM-RSM版本估算的表面积S(CPSMfs)与孔曲率无关,可与相关的S(BET)值进行比较。RSM利用了这样一个事实,即与相同的平坦孔表面相比,弯曲的孔表面容纳的分子(假定其行为如同刚性球)更少。因此,RSM认为,与平坦表面上的分子表面覆盖率(即Af)相比,具有明显曲率的孔中的分子表面覆盖率Ac(nm2/分子)更高。对于吸附在单一孔径上的氮气,Ac/Af的比值在孔径D分别为1.5 - 15 nm时,其变化范围为Ac/Af = 1.44 - 1.03。同样,对于D = 1.5 - 5.0 nm,S(CPSMfs)和S(BET)值比S(CPSM)的估算值低约10 - 45%。通过将CPSM-RSM模型应用于几种呈现所有已知类型吸附滞后回线的多孔材料,证实了对于所研究的材料,S(BET)约等于S(CPSMfs)(±5%),且(S(CPSM) - S(BET))/S(BET) = 3 - 68%。总之,对于呈现具有明显孔曲率的孔结构的材料,BET法可能会得出相当保守的表面积估算值,而CPSM-RSM模型能够可靠地预测S(CPSM)和S(CPSMfs) = S(BET)值。