Efstratiadis Stella, Baumrind Sheldon, Shofer Frances, Jacobsson-Hunt Ulla, Laster Larry, Ghafari Joseph
Division of Orthodontics, School of Dental and Oral Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Nov;128(5):607-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.036.
The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate cephalometric changes in subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion who were treated with headgear (HG) or Fränkel function regulator (FR) and (2) to compare findings from regional superpositions of cephalometric structures with those from conventional cephalometric measurements.
Cephalographs were taken at baseline, after 1 year, and after 2 years of 65 children enrolled in a prospective randomized clinical trial. The spatial location of the landmarks derived from regional superpositions was evaluated in a coordinate system oriented on natural head position. The superpositions included the best anatomic fit of the anterior cranial base, maxillary base, and mandibular structures.
Both the HG and the FR were effective in correcting the distoclusion, and they generated enhanced differential growth between the jaws. Differences between cranial and maxillary superpositions regarding mandibular displacement (Point B, pogonion, gnathion, menton) were noted: the HG had a more horizontal vector on maxillary superposition that was also greater (.0001 < P < .05) than the horizontal displacement observed with the FR. This discrepancy appeared to be related to (1) the clockwise (backward) rotation of the palatal and mandibular planes observed with the HG; the palatal plane's rotation, which was transferred through the occlusion to the mandibular plane, was factored out on maxillary superposition; and (2) the interaction between the inclination of the maxillary incisors and the forward movement of the mandible during growth.
Findings from superpositions agreed with conventional angular and linear measurements regarding the basic conclusions for the primary effects of HG and FR. However, the results suggest that inferences of mandibular displacement are more reliable from maxillary than cranial superposition when evaluating occlusal changes during treatment.
本研究的目的是(1)评估使用头帽(HG)或弗兰克功能调节器(FR)治疗的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者的头影测量变化,以及(2)将头影测量结构的区域叠加结果与传统头影测量结果进行比较。
对65名参加前瞻性随机临床试验的儿童,在基线、1年后和2年后拍摄头影定位X线片。在以自然头位为导向的坐标系中评估区域叠加得出的标志点的空间位置。叠加包括前颅底、上颌基骨和下颌结构的最佳解剖拟合。
HG和FR在纠正远中错牙合方面均有效,并且它们使上下颌之间产生了增强的差异生长。注意到在颅骨和上颌叠加中关于下颌位移(B点、颏前点、颌下点、颏下点)的差异:HG在上颌叠加时具有更水平的向量,且也大于FR观察到的水平位移(.0001 < P <.05)。这种差异似乎与以下因素有关:(1)HG观察到的腭平面和下颌平面的顺时针(向后)旋转;腭平面的旋转通过咬合传递到下颌平面,在上颌叠加时被排除;以及(2)上颌切牙倾斜度与生长期间下颌向前移动之间的相互作用。
叠加结果与关于HG和FR主要作用的基本结论的传统角度和线性测量结果一致。然而,结果表明,在评估治疗期间的咬合变化时,从颌骨位移的推断来看,上颌叠加比颅骨叠加更可靠。