Suppr超能文献

美国正畸委员会牙模客观评分系统数字模型分析准确性的评估

Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.

作者信息

Costalos Peter A, Sarraf Keivan, Cangialosi Thomas J, Efstratiadis Stella

机构信息

Columbia University, School of Dental and Oral Surgery, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Nov;128(5):624-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.017.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In 1999, after 3 years of field testing, the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) implemented a grading system for posttreatment orthodontic models and panoramic radiographs, to make the phase III examination both fair and objective. In the ABO's objective grading system, 7 occlusal criteria (tooth alignment, vertical positioning of marginal ridges, buccolingual inclination of posterior teeth, occlusal relationship, occlusal contacts, overjet, and interproximal contacts) are measured on plaster models to assess a patient's final occlusion. To date, no study has evaluated the ABO grading system for use on digital models. The purpose of this study was to determine whether digital models can be used with reasonable accuracy and reliability for assessing patients' final occlusions.

METHODS

Plaster and digital (OrthoCAD, Cadent Inc, Carlstadt, NJ) posttreatment models of 24 patients were gathered from the postgraduate orthodontic clinic at Columbia University School of Dental and Oral Surgery. The plaster models were scored by using the ABO measuring gauge and the 7 criteria of the ABO grading system. A second analysis was done on the digital models. To determine interexaminer error, a fourth-year dental student at Columbia University served as a second examiner and repeated all the analyses.

RESULTS

The means of the total score and those for marginal ridges, occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, overjet, and interproximal contacts were not significantly different between plaster and digital models. However, the means for alignment and buccolingual inclination were significantly different. In addition, the scorings of 2 examiners differed for the 2 methods.

CONCLUSIONS

This finding suggests that alignment and buccolingual inclination should be reevaluated with both methods, and adequate calibration of the examiners is essential to achieve repeatability in both methods. Digital models might be acceptable for use in the ABO model examination.

摘要

引言

1999年,经过3年的现场测试,美国正畸委员会(ABO)实施了一种用于正畸治疗后模型和全景X线片的分级系统,以使第三阶段检查更加公平和客观。在ABO的客观分级系统中,在石膏模型上测量7个咬合标准(牙齿排列、边缘嵴的垂直位置、后牙的颊舌向倾斜、咬合关系、咬合接触、覆盖和邻面接触),以评估患者的最终咬合情况。迄今为止,尚无研究评估ABO分级系统在数字模型上的应用。本研究的目的是确定数字模型是否能够以合理的准确性和可靠性用于评估患者的最终咬合情况。

方法

从哥伦比亚大学牙科学院和口腔外科的研究生正畸诊所收集了24例患者的石膏和数字(OrthoCAD,Cadent公司,新泽西州卡尔施塔特)正畸治疗后模型。使用ABO测量仪和ABO分级系统的7个标准对石膏模型进行评分。对数字模型进行了第二次分析。为了确定检查者之间的误差,哥伦比亚大学的一名四年级牙科学生作为第二检查者重复了所有分析。

结果

石膏模型和数字模型在总分以及边缘嵴、咬合接触、咬合关系、覆盖和邻面接触的得分均值上没有显著差异。然而,在排列和颊舌向倾斜方面的得分均值存在显著差异。此外,两种方法在两名检查者的评分上也存在差异。

结论

这一发现表明,应使用两种方法重新评估排列和颊舌向倾斜情况,并且对检查者进行充分校准对于两种方法实现可重复性至关重要。数字模型可能可用于ABO模型检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验