Suppr超能文献

正畸临床完成误差的分析:常见类型及预测。

Orthodontic finishing errors detected in board-approved cases: common types and prediction.

机构信息

Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (Brazil).

Federal University of Goiás, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics (Goiânia/GO, Brazil).

出版信息

Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Sep 2;29(4):e2424102. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.4.e2424102.oar. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report and rank orthodontic finishing errors recorded in the clinical phase of the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO) examination and correlate pretreatment case complexity with orthodontic treatment outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center cross-sectional survey collected retrospective data from the clinical phase of BBO examinations between 2016 and 2023. The quality of orthodontic clinical outcomes of each case was assessed by means of the Cast-Radiograph Evaluation (CRE), while case complexity was evaluated using the Discrepancy Index (DI), both tools provided by the American Board of Orthodontics. Survey items were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and a correlation analysis between total CRE and DI scores (p<0.05) was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 447 orthodontic records was included. Orthodontic finishing errors were often observed, and no case was completely perfect. In the total CRE score, an average of 15 points was discounted for each case. Most frequently found issues involved problems with alignment, buccolingual inclination, marginal ridge, and occlusal relationship. The median DI score for initial case complexity was 22.0 (range 10.0 - 67.0). There was no significant correlation between the DI and CRE scores (p=0.106).

CONCLUSION

Orthodontic finishing errors are inevitable, even in well-finished board-approved cases. Rotation, excessive buccolingual inclination, and discrepancies in marginal ridges are the most frequently observed areas of concern, in that order. Moreover, while case complexity, determined by DI, can impact orthodontic planning and pose challenges for clinicians, the study did not consider it a determining factor in predicting treatment outcomes.

摘要

目的

报告并排名巴西正畸委员会(BBO)检查临床阶段记录的正畸完成误差,并将治疗前病例复杂性与正畸治疗结果相关联。

材料和方法

本单中心横断面调查收集了 2016 年至 2023 年 BBO 检查临床阶段的回顾性数据。通过 Cast-Radiograph Evaluation(CRE)评估每个病例的正畸临床结果质量,同时使用美国正畸委员会提供的 Discrepancy Index(DI)评估病例复杂性。使用描述性统计分析调查项目,并对总 CRE 和 DI 评分之间的相关性进行分析(p<0.05)。

结果

共纳入 447 例正畸记录。经常观察到正畸完成误差,没有一个病例是完全完美的。在总 CRE 评分中,每个病例平均扣 15 分。最常见的问题涉及排列、颊舌倾斜、边缘嵴和咬合关系。初始病例复杂性的中位数 DI 评分为 22.0(范围 10.0-67.0)。DI 和 CRE 评分之间没有显著相关性(p=0.106)。

结论

正畸完成误差是不可避免的,即使是在完成良好并获得委员会认可的病例中也是如此。旋转、过度颊舌倾斜和边缘嵴差异是最常关注的区域,依次为。此外,虽然由 DI 确定的病例复杂性可以影响正畸计划并对临床医生提出挑战,但该研究并未将其视为预测治疗结果的决定因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa45/11368236/b8e55e94dc80/2177-6709-dpjo-29-04-e2424102-gf1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验