Apkon Michael, Mattera Jennifer A, Lin Zhenqiu, Herrin Jeph, Bradley Elizabeth H, Carbone Michael, Holmboe Eric S, Gross Cary P, Selter Jared G, Rich Amy S, Krumholz Harlan M
Yale-New Haven Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Nov 14;165(20):2388-94. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.20.2388.
Decision-support information technology is often adopted to improve clinical decision making, but it is rarely rigorously evaluated. Congress mandated the evaluation of Problem-Knowledge Couplers (PKC Corp, Burlington, Vt), a decision-support tool proposed for the Department of Defense's new health information network.
This was a patient-level randomized trial conducted at 2 military practices. A total of 936 patients were allocated to the intervention group and 966 to usual care. Couplers were applied before routine ambulatory clinic visits. The primary outcome was quality of care, which was assessed based on the total percentage of any of 24 health care quality process measures (opportunities to provide evidence-based care) that were fulfilled. Secondary outcomes included medical resources consumed within 60 days of enrollment and patient and provider satisfaction.
There were 4639 health care opportunities (2374 in the Coupler group and 2265 in the usual-care group), with no difference in the proportion of opportunities fulfilled (33.9% vs 30.7%; P = .12). Although there was a modest improvement in performance on screening/preventive measures, it was offset by poorer performance on some measures of acute care. Coupler patients used more laboratory and pharmacy resources than usual-care patients (logarithmic mean difference, 71 dollars). No difference in patient satisfaction was observed between groups, and provider satisfaction was mixed.
This study provides no strong evidence to support the utility of this decision-support tool, but it demonstrates the value of rigorous evaluation of decision-support information technology.
决策支持信息技术常被用于改善临床决策,但很少得到严格评估。国会要求对问题-知识耦合器(PKC公司,佛蒙特州伯灵顿)进行评估,这是一种为国防部新的健康信息网络提议的决策支持工具。
这是一项在两家军事医疗机构进行的患者层面的随机试验。总共936名患者被分配到干预组,966名患者接受常规护理。耦合器在常规门诊就诊前应用。主要结局是护理质量,根据24项医疗保健质量过程指标(提供循证护理的机会)中任何一项得到满足的总百分比进行评估。次要结局包括入组后60天内消耗的医疗资源以及患者和提供者的满意度。
共有4639次医疗保健机会(耦合器组2374次,常规护理组2265次),机会得到满足的比例没有差异(33.9%对30.7%;P = 0.12)。尽管筛查/预防措施的表现有适度改善,但被一些急性护理指标的较差表现所抵消。耦合器组患者比常规护理组患者使用了更多的实验室和药房资源(对数平均差异为71美元)。两组患者满意度没有差异,提供者满意度参差不齐。
本研究没有提供有力证据支持这种决策支持工具的效用,但它证明了对决策支持信息技术进行严格评估的价值。