• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心血管疾病预防临床决策支持系统的成本与经济效益:社区指南系统评价

Cost and economic benefit of clinical decision support systems for cardiovascular disease prevention: a community guide systematic review.

作者信息

Jacob Verughese, Thota Anilkrishna B, Chattopadhyay Sajal K, Njie Gibril J, Proia Krista K, Hopkins David P, Ross Murray N, Pronk Nicolaas P, Clymer John M

机构信息

Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Kaiser Institute for Health Policy, Oakland, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 May 1;24(3):669-676. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw160.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocw160
PMID:28049635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5538577/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This review evaluates costs and benefits associated with acquiring, implementing, and operating clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Methods developed for the Community Guide were used to review CDSS literature covering the period from January 1976 to October 2015. Twenty-one studies were identified for inclusion.

RESULTS

It was difficult to draw a meaningful estimate for the cost of acquiring and operating CDSSs to prevent CVD from the available studies ( n  = 12) due to considerable heterogeneity. Several studies ( n  = 11) indicated that health care costs were averted by using CDSSs but many were partial assessments that did not consider all components of health care. Four cost-benefit studies reached conflicting conclusions about the net benefit of CDSSs based on incomplete assessments of costs and benefits. Three cost-utility studies indicated inconsistent conclusions regarding cost-effectiveness based on a conservative $50,000 threshold.

DISCUSSION

Intervention costs were not negligible, but specific estimates were not derived because of the heterogeneity of implementation and reporting metrics. Expected economic benefits from averted health care cost could not be determined with confidence because many studies did not fully account for all components of health care.

CONCLUSION

We were unable to conclude whether CDSSs for CVD prevention is either cost-beneficial or cost-effective. Several evidence gaps are identified, most prominently a lack of information about major drivers of cost and benefit, a lack of standard metrics for the cost of CDSSs, and not allowing for useful life of a CDSS that generally extends beyond one accounting period.

摘要

目的

本综述评估获取、实施和运行临床决策支持系统(CDSS)以预防心血管疾病(CVD)的成本和效益。

材料与方法

采用为《社区指南》制定的方法,对1976年1月至2015年10月期间的CDSS文献进行综述。确定了21项研究纳入。

结果

由于存在相当大的异质性,很难从现有研究(n = 12)中得出关于获取和运行CDSS以预防CVD的成本的有意义估计。几项研究(n = 11)表明,使用CDSS可避免医疗保健成本,但许多是部分评估,未考虑医疗保健的所有组成部分。四项成本效益研究基于对成本和效益的不完整评估,对CDSS的净效益得出了相互矛盾的结论。三项成本效用研究基于50,000美元的保守阈值,对成本效益得出了不一致的结论。

讨论

干预成本不可忽略,但由于实施和报告指标的异质性,未得出具体估计值。由于许多研究未充分考虑医疗保健的所有组成部分,无法确定避免医疗保健成本带来的预期经济效益。

结论

我们无法得出用于预防CVD的CDSS是否具有成本效益或成本效果的结论。确定了几个证据缺口,最突出的是缺乏关于成本和效益主要驱动因素的信息、缺乏CDSS成本的标准指标,以及未考虑CDSS的使用寿命通常超出一个会计期间。

相似文献

1
Cost and economic benefit of clinical decision support systems for cardiovascular disease prevention: a community guide systematic review.心血管疾病预防临床决策支持系统的成本与经济效益:社区指南系统评价
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 May 1;24(3):669-676. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw160.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
7
Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.仑伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗治疗未经治疗的晚期肾细胞癌:系统评价和成本效果分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(49):1-190. doi: 10.3310/TRRM4238.
8
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
9
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.

引用本文的文献

1
New Performance Measurement Framework for Realizing Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support: Qualitative Development Study.实现以患者为中心的临床决策支持的新绩效评估框架:定性发展研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e68674. doi: 10.2196/68674.
2
A balancing act: the promise and pitfalls of clinical decision support.一场平衡行动:临床决策支持的前景与陷阱
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2025 Mar 24;38(3):233-234. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2478758. eCollection 2025.
3
Electronic health record nudges to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure.电子健康记录推动优化心力衰竭的指南指导药物治疗。
Heart Fail Rev. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1007/s10741-025-10503-4.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Clinical Decision Support to Improve CKD Outcomes Among First Nations Australians.临床决策支持对改善澳大利亚原住民慢性肾脏病结局的成本效益分析
Kidney Int Rep. 2024 Nov 9;10(2):549-564. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.10.028. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Digital innovations in breast cancer care: exploring the potential and challenges of digital therapeutics and clinical decision support systems.乳腺癌护理中的数字创新:探索数字疗法和临床决策支持系统的潜力与挑战。
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 3;10:20552076241288821. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288821. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Outcomes of clinical decision support systems in real-world perioperative care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.临床决策支持系统在现实围手术期护理中的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8057-8072. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001821.
7
How intervention studies measure the effectiveness of medication safety-related clinical decision support systems in primary and long-term care: a systematic review.干预研究如何衡量药物安全相关临床决策支持系统在初级保健和长期护理中的有效性:系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jul 4;24(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02596-y.
8
Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities.利用临床决策支持系统的力量:挑战与机遇。
Open Heart. 2023 Nov 28;10(2):e002432. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432.
9
Using Clinical Decision Support Systems to Decrease Intravenous Acetaminophen Use: Implementation and Lessons Learned.使用临床决策支持系统减少静脉用对乙酰氨基酚的使用:实施情况和经验教训。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Jan;15(1):64-74. doi: 10.1055/a-2216-5775. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
10
Achieving Value by Risk Stratification With Machine Learning Model or Clinical Risk Score in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Cost Minimization Analysis.基于机器学习模型或临床风险评分的急性上消化道出血风险分层实现价值:成本最小化分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 1;119(2):371-373. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002520. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Executive Summary: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.执行摘要:《2016年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):447-54. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000366.
2
Clinical Decision Support Systems Recommended to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease.推荐使用临床决策支持系统预防心血管疾病。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):796-799. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.041.
3
Clinical Decision Support Systems and Prevention: A Community Guide Cardiovascular Disease Systematic Review.临床决策支持系统与预防:《社区心血管疾病预防指南》系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):784-795. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.006.
4
Evaluating Diabetes Outcomes and Costs Within an Ambulatory Setting: A Strategic Approach Utilizing a Clinical Decision Support System.在门诊环境中评估糖尿病治疗结果与成本:一种利用临床决策支持系统的策略方法。
Clin Diabetes. 2014 Jul;32(3):113-20. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.32.3.113.
5
Pilot study to validate a computer-based clinical decision support system for dyslipidemia treatment (HTE-DLP).验证基于计算机的血脂异常治疗临床决策支持系统(HTE-DLP)的初步研究。
Atherosclerosis. 2013 Dec;231(2):401-4. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.09.029. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
6
Effect of pay-for-performance incentives on quality of care in small practices with electronic health records: a randomized trial.基于电子病历的小型医疗实践中按绩效付费激励对医疗质量的影响:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2013 Sep 11;310(10):1051-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.277353.
7
Enabling health care decisionmaking through clinical decision support and knowledge management.通过临床决策支持和知识管理实现医疗保健决策。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Apr(203):1-784.
8
Management of raised glucose, a clinical decision tool to reduce length of stay of patients with hyperglycaemia.高血糖管理,一种降低高血糖患者住院时间的临床决策工具。
Diabet Med. 2013 Jan;30(1):81-7. doi: 10.1111/dme.12006.
9
Healthcare information technology and economics.医疗保健信息技术与经济学。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):212-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000821. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
10
Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review.临床决策支持系统的效果:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 3;157(1):29-43. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450.