Riegel Barbara, Birnbaum Alice, Aufderheide Tom P, Thode Henry C, Henry Mark C, Van Ottingham Lois, Swor Robert
School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6096, USA.
Am Heart J. 2005 Nov;150(5):927-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.01.042.
Few data exist regarding the retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) skills over time in relationship to characteristics of lay volunteer responders, training, or risk of exposure to victims. The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics associated with adequate CPR and AED skill retention.
Skill retention was tested 3 to 18 months (mean 6.9 +/- 3.5 months) after initial training. Instructors judged adequacy of performance of essential CPR or AED skills and provided an overall assessment (adequate/inadequate), which was used as the outcome. Data on 7261 laypersons trained in CPR (4358 also received AED training) in 24 sites across the United States and Canada were available from the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial. Characteristics of the volunteers, classes, and facilities were evaluated as predictors of performance adequacy. Adjusting for site, intervention assignment (CPR-only or CPR + AED), and time since initial training, volunteer characteristics associated with adequate CPR performance were age (OR 0.78 per 10-year increment), male sex (OR 1.44), minority (OR 0.62), married (OR 1.35), prior emergency experience (OR 1.66), prior CPR class (OR 1.68), prior advanced training (OR 1.59), and extracurricular CPR training (OR 1.91) (all P < .05). Characteristics associated with AED performance included age (OR 0.69), college education (OR 1.34), and native language other than English (OR 0.51) (all P < .05).
Certain subgroups of lay volunteers may need targeted outreach programs in CPR and AED use, classes with longer training time, more practice, or more intense retraining to maintain their CPR and/or AED skills.
关于心肺复苏(CPR)和自动体外除颤器(AED)技能随时间的保持情况,以及与非专业志愿者响应者的特征、培训或接触受害者风险之间的关系,现有数据较少。本研究的目的是描述与CPR和AED技能充分保持相关的特征。
在初始培训后3至18个月(平均6.9±3.5个月)对技能保持情况进行测试。教员判断基本CPR或AED技能的操作是否充分,并给出总体评估(充分/不充分),该评估用作结果。来自美国和加拿大24个地点的7261名接受CPR培训的非专业人员(其中4358人也接受了AED培训)的数据可从公众可及除颤(PAD)试验中获取。将志愿者、课程和设施的特征评估为操作充分性的预测因素。在对地点、干预分配(仅CPR或CPR+AED)以及初始培训后的时间进行调整后,与CPR操作充分相关的志愿者特征包括年龄(每增加10岁,OR为0.78)、男性(OR为1.44)、少数族裔(OR为0.62)、已婚(OR为1.35)、既往急救经验(OR为1.66)、既往CPR课程(OR为1.68)、既往高级培训(OR为1.59)以及课外CPR培训(OR为1.91)(均P<.05)。与AED操作相关的特征包括年龄(OR为0.69)、大学学历(OR为1.34)以及非英语母语(OR为0.51)(均P<.05)。
某些非专业志愿者亚组可能需要针对CPR和AED使用的定向推广项目、更长培训时间的课程、更多练习或更强化的再培训,以维持其CPR和/或AED技能。