Simmons A M, Schwartz J J, Ferragamo M
Department of Psychology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 May;91(5):2831-44. doi: 10.1121/1.402964.
A population study of auditory nerve responses in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana, analyzed the relative contributions of spectral and temporal coding in representing a complex, species-specific communication signal at different stimulus intensities and in the presence of background noise. At stimulus levels of 70 and 80 dB SPL, levels which approximate that received during communication in the natural environment, average rate profiles plotted over fiber characteristic frequency do not reflect the detailed spectral fine structure of the synthetic call. Rate profiles do not change significantly in the presence of background noise. In ambient (no noise) and low noise conditions, both amphibian papilla and basilar papilla fibers phase lock strongly to the waveform periodicity (fundamental frequency) of the synthetic advertisement call. The higher harmonic spectral fine structure of the synthetic call is not accurately reflected in the timing of fiber firing, because firing is "captured" by the fundamental frequency. Only a small number of fibers synchronize preferentially to any harmonic in the call other than the first, and none synchronize to any higher than the third, even when fiber characteristic frequency is close to one of these higher harmonics. Background noise affects fiber temporal responses in two ways: It can reduce synchronization to the fundamental frequency, until fiber responses are masked; or it can shift synchronization from the fundamental to the second or third harmonic of the call. This second effect results in a preservation of temporal coding at high noise levels. These data suggest that bullfrog eighth nerve fibers extract the waveform periodicity of multiple-harmonic stimuli primarily by a temporal code.
一项关于牛蛙(北美牛蛙)听觉神经反应的群体研究,分析了在不同刺激强度以及存在背景噪声的情况下,频谱编码和时间编码在表征复杂的、物种特异性通讯信号方面的相对贡献。在70和80 dB SPL的刺激水平下,这一水平接近自然环境中通讯时所接收到的水平,绘制在纤维特征频率上的平均发放率图谱并未反映合成叫声的详细频谱精细结构。在存在背景噪声的情况下,发放率图谱没有显著变化。在环境(无噪声)和低噪声条件下,两栖类乳头体和基底乳头体纤维都强烈地锁相于合成求偶叫声的波形周期性(基频)。合成叫声的较高谐波频谱精细结构在纤维放电的时间上没有得到准确反映,因为放电被基频“捕获”。只有少数纤维优先同步于叫声中除第一谐波之外的任何谐波,并且没有纤维同步于高于第三谐波的谐波,即使纤维特征频率接近这些较高谐波之一。背景噪声以两种方式影响纤维的时间反应:它可以减少与基频的同步,直到纤维反应被掩盖;或者它可以将同步从基频转移到叫声的第二或第三谐波。第二种效应导致在高噪声水平下时间编码得以保留。这些数据表明,牛蛙第八神经纤维主要通过时间编码提取多谐波刺激的波形周期性。