Suppr超能文献

臭氧标准合规监测中的潜在干扰偏差。

Potential interference bias in ozone standard compliance monitoring.

作者信息

Leston Alan R, Ollison Will M, Spicer Chester W, Satola Jan

机构信息

Air Quality Consultant, Lebanon, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2005 Oct;55(10):1464-72. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2005.10464749.

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has established a federal reference method (FRM) for ozone (O3) and allowed for designation of federal equivalent methods (FEMs). However, the ethylene-chemiluminescence FRM for O3 has been replaced by the UV photometric FEM by most state and local monitoring agencies because of its relative ease of operation. Accumulating evidence indicates that the FEM is prone to bias under the hot, humid, and stagnant conditions conducive to high O3 formation. This bias may lead to overreporting hourly O3 concentrations by as much as 20-40 ppb. Measurement bias is caused by contamination of the O3 scrubber, a problem that is not detected by dry air calibration. An adequate wet test has not been codified, although a procedure has been proposed for agency consideration. This paper includes documentation of laboratory tests quantifying specific interferant responses, collocated ambient FRM/FEM monitoring results, and smog chamber comparisons of the FRM and FEMs with alternative scrubber designs. As the numbers of reports on monitor interferences have grown, interested parties have called for agency recognition and correction of these biases.

摘要

美国环境保护局已制定了臭氧(O₃)的联邦参考方法(FRM),并允许指定联邦等效方法(FEM)。然而,由于其操作相对简便,大多数州和地方监测机构已将用于O₃的乙烯化学发光FRM替换为紫外光度法FEM。越来越多的证据表明,在有利于高O₃形成的炎热、潮湿和停滞条件下,FEM容易产生偏差。这种偏差可能导致每小时O₃浓度的报告高估多达20 - 40 ppb。测量偏差是由O₃洗涤器的污染引起的,而干燥空气校准无法检测到这个问题。尽管已提出一个程序供机构考虑,但尚未编纂出适当的湿式测试方法。本文包括量化特定干扰物响应的实验室测试文档、并置环境FRM/FEM监测结果,以及FRM和具有替代洗涤器设计的FEM在烟雾箱中的比较。随着关于监测干扰报告数量的增加,有关各方呼吁机构承认并纠正这些偏差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验