Suppr超能文献

对新推出的用于监测二氧化氮和臭氧的“无干扰”监测仪在近道路站点和符合国家环境空气质量标准的传统站点进行实地评估。

Field evaluations of newly available "interference-free" monitors for nitrogen dioxide and ozone at near-road and conventional National Ambient Air Quality Standards compliance sites.

作者信息

Leston Alan R, Ollison Will M

机构信息

a AirQuality Research & Logistics, LLC , Lebanon , CT , USA.

b American Petroleum Institute , Washington , DC , USA.

出版信息

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2017 Nov;67(11):1240-1248. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2017.1339645.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Long-standing measurement techniques for determining ground-level ozone (O) and nitrogen dioxide (NO) are known to be biased by interfering compounds that result in overestimates of high O and NO ambient concentrations under conducive conditions. An increasing near-ground O gradient (NGOG) with increasing height above ground level is also known to exist. Both the interference bias and NGOG were investigated by comparing data from a conventional Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) O photometer and an identical monitor upgraded with an "interference-free" nitric oxide O scrubber that alternatively sampled at 2 m and 6.2 m inlet heights above ground level (AGL). Intercomparison was also made between a conventional nitrogen oxide (NO) chemiluminescence Federal Reference Method (FRM) monitor and a new "direct-measure" NO NO 405 nm photometer at a near-road air quality measurement site. Results indicate that the O monitor with the upgraded scrubber recorded lower regulatory-oriented concentrations than the deployed conventional metal oxide-scrubbed monitor and that O concentrations 6.2 m AGL were higher than concentrations 2.0 m AGL, the nominal nose height of outdoor populations. Also, a new direct-measure NO photometer recorded generally lower NO regulatory-oriented concentrations than the conventional FRM chemiluminescence monitor, reporting lower daily maximum hourly average concentrations than the conventional monitor about 3 of every 5 days.

IMPLICATIONS

Employing bias-prone instruments for measurement of ambient ozone or nitrogen dioxide from inlets at inappropriate heights above ground level may result in collection of positively biased data. This paper discusses tests of new regulatory instruments, recent developments in bias-free ozone and nitrogen dioxide measurement technology, and the presence/extent of a near-ground O gradient (NGOG). Collection of unbiased monitor inlet height-appropriate data is crucial for determining accurate design values and meeting National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

摘要

未标注

长期以来,用于测定地面臭氧(O)和二氧化氮(NO)的测量技术已知会受到干扰化合物的影响而产生偏差,这会导致在有利条件下高估高O和NO环境浓度。随着距地面高度增加,近地面O梯度(NGOG)也会增大,这也是已知的。通过比较传统联邦等效方法(FEM)O光度计和配备“无干扰”一氧化氮O洗涤器升级后的相同监测器的数据,对干扰偏差和NGOG进行了研究,该监测器在距地面(AGL)2米和6.2米的入口高度交替采样。还在近道路空气质量测量站点对传统氮氧化物(NO)化学发光联邦参考方法(FRM)监测器和新型“直接测量”NO 405纳米光度计进行了比对。结果表明,配备升级洗涤器的O监测器记录的以监管为导向的浓度低于所部署的传统金属氧化物洗涤监测器,并且AGL 6.2米处的O浓度高于AGL 2.0米处的浓度,2.0米是室外人群的标称鼻高。此外,新型直接测量NO光度计记录的以监管为导向的NO浓度通常低于传统FRM化学发光监测器,每5天中约有3天报告的每日最大小时平均浓度低于传统监测器。

启示

使用易产生偏差的仪器在距地面不适当高度的入口处测量环境臭氧或二氧化氮可能会导致收集到正偏差数据。本文讨论了新监管仪器的测试、无偏差臭氧和二氧化氮测量技术的最新进展以及近地面O梯度(NGOG)的存在/程度。收集无偏差的、与监测器入口高度合适的数据对于确定准确的设计值和符合国家环境空气质量标准至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验