Maxwell David J, McIntosh Kylie A, Pulver Lisa K, Easton Kylie L
NSW Therapeutic Advisory Group Inc., PO Box 766, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Med J Aust. 2005 Nov 21;183(10):520-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb07153.x.
To describe empiric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) management in Australian hospital emergency departments (EDs) and evaluate this against national guidelines, including use of the pneumonia severity index and antibiotic selection.
A multicentre, cross-sectional, retrospective audit, April 2003 to February 2005.
37 Australian hospitals: 22 principal referral hospitals, six large major city hospitals, four large regional hospitals, four medium hospitals and one private hospital.
Adult patients with a diagnosis of CAP made in the ED. Data on 20 consecutive CAP ED presentations were collected in participating hospitals.
Documented use of the pneumonia severity index, initial antibiotic therapy prescribed in the ED, average length of stay, inpatient mortality, and concordance with national guidelines.
691 CAP presentations were included. Pneumonia severity index use was documented in 5% of cases. Antibiotic therapy covering common bacterial causes of CAP was prescribed in 67% of presentations, although overall concordance with national guidelines was 18%. Antibiotic prescribing was discordant due to inadequate empiric antimicrobial cover, allergy status (including contraindication to penicillin), inappropriate route of administration and/or inappropriate antibiotic choice according to recommendations. There was no significant difference between concordant and discordant antibiotic prescribing episodes in average length of stay (5.0 v 5.7 days; P = 0.22) or inpatient mortality (1.6% v 4.1%; chi2 = 1.82; P = 0.18).
Antibiotic therapy for CAP prescribed in Australian EDs varied. Concordance with national CAP guidelines was generally low. Targeted interventions are required to improve concordance.
描述澳大利亚医院急诊科对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的经验性治疗情况,并对照国家指南进行评估,包括肺炎严重程度指数的使用和抗生素选择。
2003年4月至2005年2月的多中心、横断面、回顾性审计。
37家澳大利亚医院,其中包括22家主要转诊医院、6家大型主要城市医院、4家大型地区医院、4家中型医院和1家私立医院。
在急诊科诊断为CAP的成年患者。参与研究的医院收集了连续20例急诊科CAP病例的数据。
记录肺炎严重程度指数的使用情况、急诊科开出的初始抗生素治疗方案、平均住院时间、住院死亡率以及与国家指南的一致性。
共纳入691例CAP病例。5%的病例记录了使用肺炎严重程度指数。67%的病例开出了针对CAP常见细菌病因的抗生素治疗方案,尽管总体上与国家指南的一致性为18%。抗生素处方存在不一致的情况,原因包括经验性抗菌覆盖不足、过敏状态(包括对青霉素的禁忌)、给药途径不当和/或根据建议选择的抗生素不合适。在平均住院时间(5.0天对5.7天;P = 0.22)或住院死亡率(1.6%对4.1%;卡方 = 1.82;P = 0.18)方面,符合和不符合抗生素处方的病例之间没有显著差异。
澳大利亚急诊科对CAP开出的抗生素治疗方案各不相同。与国家CAP指南的一致性普遍较低。需要采取有针对性的干预措施来提高一致性。