Department of Human Services, Statewide Quality Branch, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Apr;23(2):142-50. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq077. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
The objective of this study was to improve the concordance of community-acquired pneumonia management in Australian emergency departments with national guidelines through a quality improvement initiative promoting concordant antibiotic use and use of a pneumonia severity assessment tool, the pneumonia severity index (PSI).
and
Drug use evaluation, a quality improvement methodology involving data collection, evaluation, feedback and education, was undertaken. Educational interventions included academic detailing, group feedback presentations and prescribing prompts.
Data were collected on 20 consecutive adult community-acquired pneumonia emergency department presentations by each hospital for each of three audits.
Two process indicators measured the impact of the interventions: documented PSI use and concordance of antibiotic prescribing with guidelines. Comparisons were performed using a Chi-squared test.
Thirty-seven hospitals, including public, private, rural and metropolitan institutions, participated. Twenty-six hospitals completed the full study (range: 462-518 patients), incorporating two intervention phases and subsequent follow-up audits. The baseline audit of community-acquired pneumonia management demonstrated that practice was varied and mostly discordant with guidelines. Documented PSI use subsequently improved from 30/518 (6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4-8) at baseline to 125/503 (25%, 95% CI 21-29; P < 0.0001) and 102/462 (22%, 95% CI 18-26; P < 0.0001) in audits two and three, respectively, while concordant antibiotic prescribing improved from 101/518 (20%, 95% CI 16-23) to 132/462 (30%, 95% CI 26-34; P < 0.0001) and 132/462 (29%, 95% CI 24-33; P < 0.001), respectively.
Improved uptake of guideline recommendations for community-acquired pneumonia management in emergency departments was documented following a multi-faceted education intervention.
本研究旨在通过一项质量改进计划提高澳大利亚急诊科社区获得性肺炎管理的一致性,该计划通过使用一致的抗生素和肺炎严重程度评估工具(PSI)促进肺炎严重指数(PSI)的使用。
和
进行了药物使用评估,这是一种涉及数据收集、评估、反馈和教育的质量改进方法。教育干预包括学术详细说明、小组反馈演示和处方提示。
每个医院在三次审核中连续收集了 20 例成年社区获得性肺炎急诊科就诊的患者数据。
两个过程指标衡量了干预措施的影响:记录的 PSI 使用和抗生素处方与指南的一致性。使用卡方检验进行比较。
37 家医院,包括公立、私立、农村和城市机构,参与了该研究。26 家医院完成了完整的研究(范围:462-518 例患者),包括两个干预阶段和随后的随访审核。社区获得性肺炎管理的基线审核表明,实践存在差异,且大多与指南不一致。随后,记录的 PSI 使用从基线时的 30/518(6%,95%置信区间[CI]4-8)增加到审核二时的 125/503(25%,95%CI21-29;P<0.0001)和审核三时的 102/462(22%,95%CI18-26;P<0.0001),而一致的抗生素处方从 101/518(20%,95%CI16-23)增加到审核二时的 132/462(30%,95%CI26-34;P<0.0001)和审核三时的 132/462(29%,95%CI24-33;P<0.001)。
在多方面的教育干预后,记录了急诊科社区获得性肺炎管理中对指南建议的接受度提高。