de Baat C, Cune M S, Carlsson G E
Afdeling Mondziekten, Kaakchirurgie en Bijzondere Tandheelkunde van het Erasmus Medisch Centrum te Rotterdam.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2005 Oct;112(10):363-7.
Treatment of mandibular edentulousness with endosseous permucosal implants has evolved to a common treatment option during the last decades. In The Netherlands, the relative cheap prosthetic treatment of implant-supported overdentures is considered a qualitatively adequate treatment. The aim of the study described in this article was to survey the treatment of edentulous mandibles by fixed implant-supported prostheses and implant-supported overdentures, and to register the different mesostructures used. All clinics of special dental care and all larger clinics for implant dentistry in The Netherlands received a questionnaire. The data provided showed that more than 90% of patients treated with implants because of mandibular edentulousness, were provided with an overdenture. In 85% of cases a bar-clip mesostructure was used. Cost control was the most important reason to choose an overdenture above a fixed implant-supported prosthesis.
在过去几十年中，使用骨内粘膜下种植体治疗下颌无牙颌已发展成为一种常见的治疗选择。在荷兰，种植体支持的覆盖义齿相对便宜的修复治疗被认为是一种质量上足够的治疗方法。本文所述研究的目的是调查使用固定种植体支持的假体和种植体支持的覆盖义齿治疗无牙颌下颌骨的情况，并记录所使用的不同中间结构。荷兰所有特殊牙科护理诊所和所有较大的种植牙科诊所都收到了一份问卷。所提供的数据表明，因下颌无牙颌而接受种植体治疗的患者中，超过90%接受了覆盖义齿修复。在85%的病例中使用了杆夹中间结构。成本控制是选择覆盖义齿而非固定种植体支持的假体的最重要原因。
