Copeland Kristen A, Duggan Anne K, Shope Timothy R
Division of General and Community Pediatrics Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Ambul Pediatr. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):365-71. doi: 10.1367/A05-006R1.1.
The American Academy of Pediatrics published national child care illness exclusion guidelines in 1992 and 2002. To our knowledge, no published studies have examined child care providers', parents', and pediatricians' knowledge or beliefs about these guidelines.
To compare parents', pediatricians', and center-based child care providers' (CCPs) knowledge and beliefs about exclusion guidelines.
Cross-sectional survey conducted in 2000 of 80 CCPs, 142 parents, and 36 pediatricians in Baltimore City. Main outcome measures included familiarity with and knowledge of exclusion guidelines and beliefs about exclusion effectiveness among these groups.
Response rates were 58% for parents, 59% for pediatricians, 85% for CCPs. Sixteen percent of child care providers (CCPs), 39% of parents, and 53% of pediatricians had not seen any written exclusion guidelines. Compared with national guidelines for 12 common symptoms, responses from CCPs and parents indicated overexclusion, while pediatricians indicated underexclusion. The groups scored similarly in number of correct answers on knowledge items (CCPs 63%, parents 64%, pediatricians 61%, P = .44). More CCPs and parents than pediatricians believed that exclusion effectively controlled infection spread and that sick children should be excluded because they spread disease, would be more comfortable, and recover faster at home (P < .001).
This survey found CCPs, parents, and pediatricians all failed to recognize how national guidelines recommended managing 4 out of 10 common conditions on average. CCPs were more likely than pediatricians to believe that exclusion was warranted to control infection or for the child's personal needs.
美国儿科学会分别于1992年和2002年发布了全国性的儿童保育疾病排除指南。据我们所知,尚无已发表的研究探讨儿童保育提供者、家长和儿科医生对这些指南的了解或看法。
比较家长、儿科医生和基于中心的儿童保育提供者(CCP)对排除指南的了解和看法。
2000年在巴尔的摩市对80名CCP、142名家长和36名儿科医生进行了横断面调查。主要结局指标包括对排除指南的熟悉程度和了解情况,以及这些群体对排除有效性的看法。
家长的回复率为58%,儿科医生为59%,CCP为85%。16%的儿童保育提供者(CCP)、39%的家长和53%的儿科医生未曾见过任何书面排除指南。与12种常见症状的全国指南相比,CCP和家长的回复表明存在过度排除的情况,而儿科医生则表明存在排除不足的情况。在知识项目的正确答案数量上,这些群体的得分相似(CCP为63%,家长为64%,儿科医生为61%,P = 0.44)。与儿科医生相比,更多的CCP和家长认为排除能有效控制感染传播,患病儿童应被排除,因为他们会传播疾病,在家会更舒适且康复更快(P < 0.001)。
本次调查发现,CCP、家长和儿科医生均未认识到全国指南平均推荐如何处理10种常见情况中的4种。与儿科医生相比,CCP更有可能认为有必要进行排除以控制感染或满足儿童的个人需求。