低剂量肾素-血管紧张素系统双重阻断可改善非糖尿病蛋白尿患者的肾小管状态。

Low-dose dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system improves tubular status in non-diabetic proteinuric patients.

作者信息

Renke Marcin, Tylicki Leszek, Rutkowski Przemyslaw, Wojnarowski Klaudiusz, Lysiak-Szydlowska Wieslawa, Rutkowski Boleslaw

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.

出版信息

Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39(6):511-7. doi: 10.1080/00365590510031264.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Treatment with agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system is commonly regarded as a gold standard renoprotective strategy in patients with chronic kidney diseases. For maximum antiproteinuric effect, the dose titration of these agents is recommended. This therapeutic strategy is not used for proteinuric patients who are not able to receive high doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor antagonists.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In patients with primary glomerulonephritis (n=24), a randomized, triple-treatment, triple-period, cross-over study was performed to compare the effects of combined therapy with benazepril 5 mg and losartan 25 mg and monotherapy with either agent alone at a two-fold higher dose on the extent of tubular injury as assessed by alpha1-microglobulin (alpha1-m) excretion and the plasma level of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1).

RESULTS

Combination therapy significantly reduced alpha1-m excretion compared to either agent used alone: 178.29+/-27.36 to 99.63+/-13.03 mg/g creatinine for losartan + benazepril vs 178.29+/-27.36 to 161.59+/-23.22 mg/g creatinine for benazepril alone (p<0.05; ANOVA) and 178.29+/-27.36 to 99.63+/-13.03 mg/g creatinine for losartan + benazepril vs 178.29+/-27.36 to 173.45+/-27.69 mg/g creatinine for losartan alone (p<0.05; ANOVA). There was a significant correlation between change in alpha1-m excretion and reduction in proteinuria (r=0.704; p=0.023). There were no differences in TGF-beta1 level between the studied treatments. Systemic blood pressure reduction did not differ among the therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonists at very small doses may be superior to monotherapy with these agents at higher doses as far as tubular injury is concerned. We speculate that such a therapeutic strategy may be a useful approach for patients who are known not to be capable of receiving optimal renoprotective doses of these regimens.

摘要

目的

在慢性肾脏病患者中,使用抑制肾素-血管紧张素系统的药物进行治疗通常被视为一种标准的肾脏保护策略。为了达到最大的抗蛋白尿效果,建议对这些药物进行剂量滴定。对于无法接受高剂量血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂的蛋白尿患者,不采用这种治疗策略。

材料与方法

在原发性肾小球肾炎患者(n = 24)中,进行了一项随机、三联治疗、三阶段、交叉研究,以比较贝那普利5 mg与氯沙坦25 mg联合治疗以及单独使用任一药物两倍高剂量单药治疗对肾小管损伤程度的影响,肾小管损伤程度通过α1-微球蛋白(α1-m)排泄和转化生长因子-β1(TGF-β1)血浆水平进行评估。

结果

与单独使用任一药物相比,联合治疗显著降低了α1-m排泄:氯沙坦 + 贝那普利联合治疗组从178.29±27.36降至99.63±13.03 mg/g肌酐,而单独使用贝那普利组从178.29±27.36降至161.59±23.22 mg/g肌酐(p<0.05;方差分析);氯沙坦 + 贝那普利联合治疗组从178.29±27.36降至99.63±13.03 mg/g肌酐,而单独使用氯沙坦组从178.29±27.36降至173.45±27.69 mg/g肌酐(p<0.05;方差分析)。α1-m排泄变化与蛋白尿减少之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.704;p = 0.023)。研究治疗之间TGF-β1水平无差异。各治疗方法之间的系统性血压降低无差异。

结论

就肾小管损伤而言,小剂量血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与血管紧张素II 1型受体拮抗剂联合治疗可能优于高剂量单药治疗。我们推测,对于已知无法接受这些方案最佳肾脏保护剂量的患者,这种治疗策略可能是一种有用的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索