Furumatsu Yoshiyuki, Nagasawa Yasuyuki, Tomida Kodo, Mikami Satoshi, Kaneko Tetsuya, Okada Noriyuki, Tsubakihara Yoshiharu, Imai Enyu, Shoji Tatsuya
Department of Kidney Disease and Hypertension, Osaka General Medical Center, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2008 Jan;31(1):59-67. doi: 10.1291/hypres.31.59.
Although dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) with the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) is generally well-established as a treatment for nephropathy, this treatment is not fully effective in some patients. Based on the recent evidence implicating aldosterone in renal disease progression, this study was conducted to examine the efficacy of blockade with three different mechanisms by adding an aldosterone blocker in patients who do not respond adequately to the dual blockade. A 1-year randomized, open-label, multicenter, prospective controlled study was conducted, in which 32 non-diabetic nephropathy patients with proteinuria exceeding 0.5 g/day were enrolled after more than 12 weeks of ACE-I (5 mg enalapril) and ARB (50 mg losartan) combination treatment. These patients were allocated into two groups of 16 patients each: a triple blockade group in which 25 mg of spironolactone daily was added to the ACE-I and ARB combination treatment, and a control group in which 1 mg of trichlormethiazide or 20 mg of furosemide was added to the combination treatment instead of spironolactone depending upon the creatinine level. After 1 year of treatment, the urinary protein level decreased by 58% (p<0.05) with the triple blockade but was unchanged in the controls. Furthermore, urinary type IV collagen level decreased by 40% (p<0.05) with the triple blockade but was unchanged in the controls. The decreases in urinary protein and urinary type IV collagen were not accompanied by a decrease in blood pressure. Mean serum creatinine, potassium and blood pressure did not change significantly by either treatment. In conclusion, triple blockade of the RAAS was effective for the treatment of proteinuria in patients with non-diabetic nephropathy whose increased urinary protein had not responded sufficiently to a dual blockade.
虽然联合使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE-I)和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)对肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)进行双重阻断通常已被确认为治疗肾病的方法,但这种治疗在某些患者中并不完全有效。基于最近有证据表明醛固酮与肾脏疾病进展有关,本研究旨在通过在对双重阻断反应不佳的患者中添加醛固酮阻滞剂来检验三种不同作用机制的阻断效果。进行了一项为期1年的随机、开放标签、多中心、前瞻性对照研究,在超过12周的ACE-I(5毫克依那普利)和ARB(50毫克氯沙坦)联合治疗后,纳入了32例蛋白尿超过0.5克/天的非糖尿病肾病患者。这些患者被分为两组,每组16例:三重阻断组,在ACE-I和ARB联合治疗中每日添加25毫克螺内酯;对照组,根据肌酐水平,在联合治疗中添加1毫克三氯噻嗪或20毫克呋塞米代替螺内酯。治疗1年后,三重阻断组尿蛋白水平下降了58%(p<0.05),而对照组无变化。此外,三重阻断组尿IV型胶原水平下降了40%(p<0.05),而对照组无变化。尿蛋白和尿IV型胶原的下降并未伴随血压下降。两种治疗方法对平均血清肌酐、钾和血压均无显著影响。总之,RAAS的三重阻断对非糖尿病肾病患者蛋白尿的治疗有效,这些患者尿蛋白增加对双重阻断反应不足。