• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

已知的精子捐献者:是否成为孩子的父母。

Known semen donors: to be or not to be a parent.

作者信息

Sifris Adiva

机构信息

Faculty of Law, PO Box 12, Monash University, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2005 Nov;13(2):230-44.

PMID:16304763
Abstract

The law has failed to keep pace with the reality that lesbian couples are conceiving children and raising families. At both Commonwealth and State levels, a complex web of legislation engulfs and winds its way through this area of the law. This article seeks to expose some of the bizarre and anomalous consequences that have emerged through the interaction of these provisions and the resulting judicial interpretations. It is argued that this incongruous, unsatisfactory situation cannot be allowed to continue. Uniform State and Commonwealth legislation must be enacted and existing Commonwealth legislation modified to avoid ongoing inconsistencies. Finally, legislative amendments are recommended which, it is argued, will go some way towards rectifying the situation.

摘要

法律未能跟上女同性恋伴侣生育子女和组建家庭这一现实情况。在英联邦和州层面,一系列复杂的立法涵盖并贯穿于这一法律领域。本文旨在揭示这些条款相互作用以及由此产生的司法解释所带来的一些离奇和异常的后果。有人认为,这种不协调、不尽如人意的状况不能再继续下去。必须制定统一的州和英联邦立法,并对现有的英联邦立法进行修改,以避免持续存在的不一致情况。最后,建议进行立法修正,有人认为这将在一定程度上纠正这种状况。

相似文献

1
Known semen donors: to be or not to be a parent.已知的精子捐献者:是否成为孩子的父母。
J Law Med. 2005 Nov;13(2):230-44.
2
Donor, father or parent? Conceiving paternity in the Australian Family Court.捐赠者、父亲还是父母?在澳大利亚家庭法院确定亲子关系。
Int J Law Policy Family. 2004 Apr;18(1):76-102. doi: 10.1093/lawfam/18.1.76.
3
One, two or three parents? Lesbian co-mothers and a known donor with 'family life' under Dutch law.一位、两位还是三位家长?荷兰法律下具有“家庭生活”的女同性恋共同母亲和一位已知捐赠者。
Int J Law Policy Family. 2004 Apr;18(1):103-17. doi: 10.1093/lawfam/18.1.103.
4
[The Dutch law on artificial-insemination donor data: content and consequences].[荷兰人工授精供体数据法:内容与后果]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Jun 18;149(25):1412-6.
5
Should a sperm donor have the right to contact the children born from his sperm?
BJOG. 2019 Sep;126(10):1232. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15840. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
6
The right to know one's genetic origin: can, should, or must a state that extends this right to adoptees extend an analogous right to children conceived with donor gametes?了解自己基因起源的权利:一个将这项权利赋予被收养者的国家,是否能够、应该或必须将类似的权利赋予通过捐赠配子受孕的儿童?
Tex Law Rev. 2001 Dec;80(2):365-91.
7
[Does insemination with non-anonymous sperm donor have a future?].[使用非匿名精子捐赠者进行授精有未来吗?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Sep 9;124(17):2263-5.
8
The role of rights and utility in instituting a child's right to know her genetic history.权利与功利在确立儿童了解其遗传病史权利方面的作用。
Soc Leg Stud. 2004 Jun 1;13(2):245-64. doi: 10.1177/0964663904042553.
9
The rights of donor inseminated children to know their genetic origins in Australia.在澳大利亚,通过捐赠精子受孕出生的孩子了解其遗传起源的权利。
Aust J Fam Law. 2005 Dec;19(3):222-44.
10
The razor's edge of human bonding: artificial fathers and surrogate mothers.人类情感纽带的微妙界限:人工父亲与代孕母亲。
West New Engl Law Rev. 1983 Spring;5(4):639-66.