Zivanović Milenko, Hrvacević Rajko, Kovacević Zoran, Veljancić Ljubisa, Vujanić Svetlana
Zdravstveni centar, Sluzba za nefrologiju i dijalizu, Srbija i Crna Gora.
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2005 Oct;62(10):725-9. doi: 10.2298/vsp0510725z.
BACKGROUND/AIM: The efficacy and biocompatibility of hemodialysis have a singnificant impact on dialysis patient morbidity and mortality rate. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and biocompatibility of different hemodialysis modalities in our patients.
A total of 55 patients were included in the study, and on the basis of dialysis modality, they were divided in four groups: group I--post-dilution on-line hemodiafiltration (n=15), group II--bicarbonate high-flux polysulphone hemodialysis (n=15), group III--bicarbonate low-flux polysulphone hemodialysis (n=15), and groupe IV--bicarbonate cuprophane hemodialysis (n=10). The efficacy was evaluated on the basis of urea reduction rate (URR), urea Kt/V index and serum beta2-microglobuline reduction rate, and the biocompatibility was evaluated on the basis of the leukocyte count fall during the first fiftheen minutes of dialysis session, and of the serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level.
The highest mean URR was achieved in the group I (70.53 +/- 6.49%), and it was significantly higher in comparison with the average URR in the group IV (54.8 +/- 6.35%) (p = 0.001). The average value of urea Kt/V index in the group I (1.48 +/- 0.22) was significantly higher in comparison with the average value in the group II 1.30 +/- 0.22 (p < 0.05), group III (1.05 +/- 0.22), and group IV (0.98 + 0.22) (p = 0.001). Serum beta2-microglobuline reduction rate was 68.93 +/- 8.25% in the group I, and 58.86 +/- 7.98% in the groupe II (p = 0.01). During the first 15 minutes of hemodialysis the leukocyte number was decreased by 12.57 +/- 9.35% in the group 1, 13.61 +/- 9.64% in the group 11, 18.3 +/- 13.24 in the group III and 62.3 +/- 15.4 in the group IV, on average. The mean serum level of CRP was 9.4 +/- 6.47 mg/l in the group IV, and less than 3.5 mg/l in the group I of the patients (p = 0.001).
Postdilution on-line hemodiafiltration in comparison with standard hemodialysis provided the more effective elimination of small and middle uremic toxins molecules and a significantly higher degree of biocompatibility. The patients treated with standard hemodialysis frequently do not achieve the minimal value of urea Kt/V index prescribed by National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Inatiatives standards. These patients also have significantly higher serum CRP values which suggest the state of chronic microinflammation.
背景/目的:血液透析的疗效和生物相容性对透析患者的发病率和死亡率有重大影响。我们研究的目的是比较不同血液透析方式对我们患者的疗效和生物相容性。
共有55例患者纳入本研究,根据透析方式将他们分为四组:第一组——后置式在线血液透析滤过(n = 15),第二组——碳酸氢盐高通量聚砜血液透析(n = 15),第三组——碳酸氢盐低通量聚砜血液透析(n = 15),第四组——碳酸氢盐铜仿膜血液透析(n = 10)。根据尿素清除率(URR)、尿素Kt/V指数和血清β2-微球蛋白清除率评估疗效,根据透析开始后前15分钟白细胞计数下降情况以及血清C反应蛋白(CRP)水平评估生物相容性。
第一组的平均URR最高(70.53±6.49%),与第四组的平均URR(54.8±6.35%)相比显著更高(p = 0.001)。第一组的尿素Kt/V指数平均值(1.48±0.22)与第二组(1.30±0.22)(p < 0.05)、第三组(1.05±0.22)和第四组(0.98 + 0.22)(p = 0.001)相比显著更高。第一组血清β2-微球蛋白清除率为68.93±8.25%,第二组为58.86±7.98%(p = 0.01)。血液透析开始后的前15分钟,第一组白细胞数量平均下降12.57±9.35%,第二组下降13.61±9.64%,第三组下降18.3±13.24%,第四组下降62.3±15.4%。第四组患者的血清CRP平均水平为9.4±6.47mg/l,第一组患者低于3.5mg/l(p = 0.001)。
与标准血液透析相比,后置式在线血液透析滤过能更有效地清除中小分子尿毒症毒素,且生物相容性显著更高。接受标准血液透析治疗的患者常常达不到美国国家肾脏基金会——透析预后质量倡议标准规定的尿素Kt/V指数最小值。这些患者的血清CRP值也显著更高,提示存在慢性微炎症状态。