McCarthy J T, Jenson B M, Squillace D P, Williams A W
Division of Nephrology and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Apr;29(4):576-83. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90341-3.
Our objective was to determine whether patients with chronic renal failure requiring maintenance hemodialysis retain intrinsic renal function longer when using reprocessed polysulfone (PS) membrane hemodialyzers or single-use cellulose acetate (CA) membrane hemodialyzers. Fifty consecutive patients with residual renal function (urea clearance > 2.0 mL/min) using PS dialyzers were compared with a retrospective, disease- and time-matched population of patients using CA dialyzers. Endogenous urea clearance was measured every 3 months in all patients with remaining residual function. Other data collected included age, sex, cause of chronic renal failure, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or calcium channel blockers, and hemodynamic stability during hemodialysis. All patients were observed for at least 6 months while using a single type of dialyzer. Study end points included loss of residual renal function (urea clearance < 1.0 mL/min), death, transplant, transfer to peritoneal dialysis, or change of dialyzer. The PS and CA groups of patients were well matched for sex, age, initial renal clearance, predialysis blood pressure, and hemodynamic stability during hemodialysis. The PS patients had a higher delivered Kt/V (1.34 +/- 0.30 [mean +/- SD]) than the CA patients (1.06 +/- 0.20). The PS group had a higher average urea clearance than the CA group after 4 to 9 months of dialysis (2.8 +/- 2.6 mL/min v 1.7 +/- 1.6 mL/min, respectively), after 10 to 15 months of chronic dialysis (2.0 +/- 2.4 mL/min v 1.1 +/- 1.5 mL/min, respectively), and after 16 to 21 months of dialysis (1.3 +/- 1.9 mL/min v 0.5 +/- 1.1 mL/min, respectively; all P < 0.03, t-test). After 22 to 24 months of dialysis, the difference between the two groups was not significant. When comparing patients with identical causes of chronic renal failure, there were no differences between the PS and CA groups for those with diabetes mellitus, tubulointerstitial disease, or polycystic disease. Patients with parenchymal renal disease (glomerulonephritis or nephrosclerosis) had markedly better retention of intrinsic renal function with PS than with CA dialyzers (all P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis for retention of intrinsic renal function showed that PS patients with parenchymal renal disease had a mean of 23 months before loss of intrinsic renal function, whereas for CA patients the mean was 11 months before loss of intrinsic renal function (P = 0.0005). Cellulose acetate patients lost renal function at an average rate of 0.27 +/- 0.22 mL/min/mo, whereas for PS patients the rate was 0.14 +/- 0.56 mL/min/mo (P = 0.06, rank sum). CA patients with parenchymal renal disease lost renal function at a rate of 0.29 +/- 0.22 mL/min/mo, whereas for PS patients the rate was 0.0 +/- 0.8 mL/min/mo (P = 0.004, rank sum). Age, sex, and the use of either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or calcium channel blockers did not have an effect on the loss of intrinsic renal function. Patients with nondiabetic parenchymal renal disease receiving chronic hemodialysis with hydrogen peroxide/peroxyacetic acid-reprocessed PS dialyzers and a higher Kt/V lose residual renal function at a slower rate than disease-matched patients using single-use CA dialyzers. Our findings provide further evidence that the choice of dialyzer membrane may have an effect on intrinsic renal function.
我们的目的是确定需要维持性血液透析的慢性肾衰竭患者在使用再处理聚砜(PS)膜血液透析器或一次性醋酸纤维素(CA)膜血液透析器时,其内在肾功能保留时间是否更长。将连续50例使用PS透析器且有残余肾功能(尿素清除率>2.0 mL/分钟)的患者与一组回顾性、疾病和时间匹配的使用CA透析器的患者群体进行比较。对所有仍有残余功能的患者每3个月测量一次内源性尿素清除率。收集的其他数据包括年龄、性别、慢性肾衰竭的病因、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或钙通道阻滞剂的使用情况以及血液透析期间的血流动力学稳定性。所有患者在使用单一类型透析器时至少观察6个月。研究终点包括残余肾功能丧失(尿素清除率<1.0 mL/分钟)、死亡、移植、转为腹膜透析或透析器更换。PS组和CA组患者在性别、年龄、初始肾清除率、透析前血压和血液透析期间的血流动力学稳定性方面匹配良好。PS组患者的实际Kt/V(1.34±0.30[平均值±标准差])高于CA组患者(1.06±0.20)。透析4至9个月后,PS组的平均尿素清除率高于CA组(分别为2.8±2.6 mL/分钟对1.7±1.6 mL/分钟),慢性透析10至15个月后(分别为2.0±2.4 mL/分钟对1.1±1.5 mL/分钟),以及透析16至21个月后(分别为1.3±1.9 mL/分钟对0.5±1.1 mL/分钟;所有P<0.03,t检验)。透析22至24个月后,两组之间的差异不显著。在比较慢性肾衰竭病因相同的患者时,PS组和CA组在糖尿病、肾小管间质疾病或多囊疾病患者中没有差异。患有实质性肾病(肾小球肾炎或肾硬化)的患者使用PS透析器比使用CA透析器能更好地保留内在肾功能(所有P<0.01)。对内在肾功能保留情况的Kaplan-Meier分析显示,患有实质性肾病的PS组患者在内在肾功能丧失前的平均时间为23个月,而CA组患者在内在肾功能丧失前的平均时间为11个月(P = 0.0005)。醋酸纤维素组患者肾功能丧失的平均速率为0.27±0.22 mL/分钟/月,而PS组患者的速率为0.14±0.56 mL/分钟/月(P = 0.06,秩和检验)。患有实质性肾病的CA组患者肾功能丧失的速率为0.29±0.22 mL/分钟/月,而PS组患者的速率为0.0±0.8 mL/分钟/月(P = 0.004,秩和检验)。年龄、性别以及血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或钙通道阻滞剂的使用对内在肾功能丧失没有影响。接受过氧化氢/过氧乙酸再处理PS透析器且Kt/V较高的非糖尿病实质性肾病患者慢性血液透析时,其残余肾功能丧失的速率比使用一次性CA透析器的疾病匹配患者慢。我们的研究结果进一步证明透析器膜的选择可能会对内在肾功能产生影响。